Posted on 03/12/2016 2:34:07 PM PST by skyman
FOSTER CITY (KPIX 5) A Bay Area man said he is struggling to pay his legal fees after a home intruder he shot filed a lawsuit against him.
Joe Balistreri could hardly believe an intruder sued him for negligent use of a handgun. That is my biggest issue, our judicial system allows these people to have the right to try to sue, he told KPIX 5.
Balistreri said he was merely protecting his family. I had no choice given the circumstances, he said.
On March 24, 2012, his family was spending the night at his parents home in Foster City. At 4:15 a.m., a noise woke him up.
I heard the noise coming from the front door. I heard clicking, rattling of the door handle, he recalled. I woke up my father, told him someones trying to break into your house, wheres your gun?
Balistreri said the intruder did not stop at the front door. He jumped the fence, made his way around the back of the house, through a side door and into the garage, left unlocked.
This guy is now in my house, he recalled.
In the dark home, Balistreri came face-to-face with the 64 intruder and fired three shots.
But heres the catch, the plaintiff said he was intoxicated and thought he was walking into his friends house.
There was no knocking, there was no announcement, there was no nothing, Balistreri said.
Months after the incident, there was a civil suit.
In the end, the judge sided with Balistreri. With mounting legal fees, he launched a GoFundMe account in hopes of once and for all paying off his debt and putting that horrific night behind him.
This guy put a huge burden on my shoulders, Balistreri said.
Prosecutors didnt file charges in the case. Since the shooting happened at Balistreris parents house, their homeowners insurance covered only their legal fees, not his.
The moral of the story is,if you have to shoot an intruder finish him.
Here is another reason people are supporting Trump.
BS. The administrator of the estate can sue for wrongful death.
Here is another reason people are supporting Trump.
$16,242 raised on gofundme.com so far.
True, but it’s much harder without a witness.
You won’t have a lying POS embellishing his story about how you shot him for no reason.
Don’t drink. Not recognizing your home at 4am? Stoopid.
The insurance company should pay the bills. Intoxication is a choice not an act of God and drunks should have no right Ina caseload this.
so there was no lawyer willing to work on this WITHOUT charging him $85K??
Indeed. Sad. But true.
What California needs is a law that says the shot-up criminal can't file a civil suit if their shooting was justified. Nevada has that. Not California. Too bad there are overwhelming numbers of pro-criminal voters and politicians who would prevent such a proposition or bill from becoming law.
“...The moral of the story is,if you have to shoot an intruder finish him...”
Yep. Empty the entire magazine into em...just to be sure.
Well, I'm of the opinion that if you're going to have to pay either way, GET YOUR MONEY'S WORTH!
LOL. You sound like my ex-husband. It’s easier to explain a dead body than an injured intruder.
Don’t do that,the cops will think it’s excessive.Just do a double-tap,but make it a good one.
Was there ever a doubt?
Also, having a couple of dawgs, ANY of these: Rottweiler, German Shepherd, pit bull will do A LOT to discourage any unwanted visitors.
There are a number of organizations that provide insurance for just such an incident. USCCA is but one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.