To: McCarthysGhost
Diebold machines have me very concerned. I am investigating them, their operating procedures, and the people authorized to oversee them. Red flags are in view.
But I am an objective researcher and will not jump to conclusions until there is rock solid evidence. And if I have a mountain of evidence without finding a nail in the coffin, I will turn it over to persons I know who may be able to see things I missed.
I actually hope to find Diebold vulnerabilities to be much ado about nothing. It would be so much easier to close the investigation.
201 posted on
03/08/2016 12:32:42 PM PST by
Hostage
(ARTICLE V)
To: Hostage
Thank you for your investigative work. The Diebold machines have been of real concern, especially the people authorized to oversee them. How do you monitor that? Red flags all over the place. . and then there's the
LC articles on this Robert Mercer guy (top article and scroll down) who has evidently some code or software that can affect elections by 15%? Do you know anything about Mercer? Was he told to stand down after the Sea Island confab?
205 posted on
03/08/2016 12:57:07 PM PST by
Art in Idaho
(Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
To: Hostage
Please do. Keep me posted. I assume they can be hacked?
207 posted on
03/08/2016 1:02:14 PM PST by
McCarthysGhost
(We need to repeal and replace the Republican Party)
To: Hostage
Diebold machines have me very concerned.
No reason that should be so...
231 posted on
03/08/2016 3:20:23 PM PST by
null and void
(This is "They live", and most people would rather fight you than put on the glasses...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson