Gee, Hillary, what say we apply that to an actual "right" as codified in the U.S. Constitution? Oh, I don't know, maybe that Second Amendment one?
Everyone already knew what Hillary and Bernie would say. The question should have been: “Should sincere pro-life citizens be forced through tax policy to pay for the abortions of others.”
Let's be accurate here. The legislation would not shut down a single abortuary. Rather, they would voluntarily shut down because they choose not to adhere to the same health and safety regulations that real physicians and clinics must comply with.
Clinton suggested that was unacceptable and then reminded the audience that under Roe v. Wave women have the right to make the personal decision of abortion for themselves.
Really, Hillary? The "choice" to have an abortion is not a decision the woman makes for herself, but for her child. I think that those of us who are pro-life would argue that the child should have more of a say in the "choice" to abort than the mother, since the child is most directly affected by that action.
Ask these libtards if they will impose economic boycotts of the European nations that do not take such a hardline stance of support for “abortion up to birth day”.
Roe v Wave?
Sanders is pro-abortion through birth. No limits. And “free” on the taxpayers dime.
If it’s a right then the father must equal say as a woman on the disposition of the fetus/baby, or it’s all lies.
Honestly glad the question came up. It may help a few to see the evil that the left is.
But what did anyone expect out of the left? These leaders of the left are evil with a smile on their faces.