Posted on 03/07/2016 3:32:45 PM PST by Kaslin
I saw a man go from Captain to Specialist 4 for merely saying a code word I public.
Both Clintons are such simpleton. Such, I surmise, is Yale “Law”.
I would not be surprised if Loretta Lynch decides to give Hillary a pass. Lynch did it to Lois Lerner.
I’ve posted it before, and I’ll say it again: The D.C. Grand Jury, made up of Dems, will not indict the Dem candidate. This is academic, of course, because the Dem A.G. will never prepare an indictment or urge the Grand Jury to return one.
This will provide cover for Clinton and Obama, who will say that Justice heard all the evidence, granted immunity when necessary, and found no crime. Separate rules apply for the Clintons, so I would recommend that the rest of us not try this e-mail stunt at home.
Nothing to see here, folks.
The old harridan is having an out of mind experience..
Bret Baer just let Hillary get away with ‘no e-mails marked classified’ lie. And did NOT challenge her statement that all of her ‘classified e-mails’ have been classified after the fact.
Glad to see that other people agree with my theory that Patreus’ crime was reduced to a misdemeanor as cover for Hillary. I just didn’t realize that so many people were involved in both cases.
That was dumb of him. (I suppose you meant he said a code word in public?)
I sure hope so, because that’s where she belongs.
Hillary is caught.
This is the kind of defense you put up when you know you’re guilty and that you’re caught.
Hillary is destroying the Democrat Party.
Is there some Freeper legal eagle who can shed light on this? If Lynch fails to prosecute, then that means hillary will avoid going to trial. If she’s not tried now, then doesn’t President Cruz or Trump’s AG have the option of pressing ahead with trying her? It’s not double jeopardy, right?
I wouldn’t either.
Off course they won’t and that is why I don’t believe that Trump can beat her in the general election.
We are dealing with a cabinet level appointee who egregiously broke the rules. Rules which she should have been quite familiar with, but proceeded to do so anyway, likely in a pay for play scheme she wanted to keep off the books and out of official communications loops.
No investigation of her time in office will ever be complete without investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation by heads of State and other parties and entities positioned to personally benefit from the largess of the Secretary of State or her office, or from policy decisions made thereby.
Failing to indict does not invoke double jeopardy.
I muted her so I didn’t have to hear her screech
If she hasn’t been tried and found not guilty she is still open to being charged with any crime committed until the statute of limitations runs out. IIRC, there is no statute of limitations for treason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.