If someone is going to breathlessly announce VOTER FRAUD on the basis of rigged machines, they ought to take the trouble to find out whether the machines were even used in the voting in the first place.
...........................
https://medium.com/@1e3d0077c3ca4df4b260e1ee0bceb6/voter-fraud-in-minnesota-634b488c7aa1#.rh03wy9a6
...........................
Now, I don’t know how many caucuses use machines or how the votes are counted, or how many steps it takes to get from a caucus ballot to a computerized result, but I assume there’s a machine somewhere along the way. My primary cause for concern here is that Minnesota’s secretary of state asked for new voting machines this year, and Diebold likely picked up the contract. So that means 1 of 2 things:
1. Minnesota had new machines installed by a company working closely with a data security firm with links to the caucus process. Even if the email link is invalid, Diebold is heavily indebted to certain parts of the GOP. Rubio suspiciously wins on these machines despite polling indicating an 11 point Trump lead.
2. Minnesota is running 15-year old voting machines shot through with vulnerabilities. Even if the email address link isn’t valid, we know there’s an active exploit that allows jimmying with votes.
....................
Tell it to these boys you old fart. Its what I was talking about to begin with.
If you don't think a paper ballot can disappear ,be torn up or lost on purpose you are more naive than ever.