Posted on 03/06/2016 4:18:43 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
March 6th, 2016
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Radio host Rush Limbaugh; 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Romney.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus ; Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz; Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton..
THIS WEEK (ABC): Republican presidential candidate John Kasich; Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders; Priebus.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio; Sanders; Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas; Romney.
Sharyl Attkisson’s Full Measure Full Measure tackles one of the biggest topics in American today - the southern border. We travel to the 372 mile long border between Arizona and Mexico where the question is: who's really calling the shots?
I think he'll do fine.
What I noticed about him is that he is able to communicate with people at their level.
He also does not attack unless attacked first, in which case, he fights back. he doesn't turn the other cheek. he fights back at the level he was attacked.
Show him disrespect, he will disrespect you.
Also, consider his business, if he acted like a juvenile throughout these past 35 years, would he have been so successful? I think he will do well with other leaders. They're human after all and all have some thing which is juvenile.
There's a big difference between Chapter 7 and Chapter 11.
Everyone knows that hillary won’t be indicted.At least by the present regime.One of the problems with waiting until after the election. Problem is FBI chief Comey recently hinted that the FBI may start leaking like a sieve when all that goes down.
If they get enough info to create a grand jury(which may have already happened who knows) and the intel starts flowing without any consequences to the principles look for certain journalists to have so many spokespeople they don’t know what to do with all the info. Some say its already begun.
Outstanding that could be a huge difference let’s hope it happens.
The only fly in the ointment is FBI Director James Comey who could recommend a criminal indictment against Hillary. The evidence is overwhelming that he should, but will the FBI meet this titanic test of integrity and the Rule of Law or will the Clintons once again elude accountability for their actions? If the FBI fails the test, then the veil will be lifted on the extent of the corruption and rot that permeates the highest levels of our government, including the career bureaucracy.
...........................
https://medium.com/@1e3d0077c3ca4df4b260e1ee0bceb6/voter-fraud-in-minnesota-634b488c7aa1#.rh03wy9a6
...........................
Now, I don’t know how many caucuses use machines or how the votes are counted, or how many steps it takes to get from a caucus ballot to a computerized result, but I assume there’s a machine somewhere along the way. My primary cause for concern here is that Minnesota’s secretary of state asked for new voting machines this year, and Diebold likely picked up the contract. So that means 1 of 2 things:
1. Minnesota had new machines installed by a company working closely with a data security firm with links to the caucus process. Even if the email link is invalid, Diebold is heavily indebted to certain parts of the GOP. Rubio suspiciously wins on these machines despite polling indicating an 11 point Trump lead.
2. Minnesota is running 15-year old voting machines shot through with vulnerabilities. Even if the email address link isn’t valid, we know there’s an active exploit that allows jimmying with votes.
....................
Tell it to these boys you old fart. Its what I was talking about to begin with.
If you don't think a paper ballot can disappear ,be torn up or lost on purpose you are more naive than ever.
Is it possible,(it has already been suggested,) that a grand jury has already been called and if so who called it and what will be the purpose be and if they reach a point where they issue an indictment will we hear about it?Do they work in secret? I don’t have a clue about how any of that works at that level who pulls the strings, etc.
But of course it was all about Romney and that bit of nastiness he engaged in recently. Also TWO truths to hold close to the vest about this upcoming election that yon reader might need to know.
No.
or is this a real thing that could happen?
Yes.
My guess is Terry McAwful, the Virginia governor. But it could as well be the Castros. The Democrats like Fidel and they aren't much different.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/legendary-u-s-attorney-confident-doj-convened-hillary-grand-jury/
Now that I recall Hannity did have Digenova and his wife on as well,forgot her name,she's a lawyer as well. This ocuuld already be going on.
.........................
"When Hillary Clinton set up the server, she therefore had the intent to transfer classified information in a non-secure network, and she thereby automatically violated the statute that makes it a crime to store and maintain improperly classified documents,” he continued.
“In addition, knowing that you have a private server, you of course are naturally going to take off the markings that show a document is classified, because you know you cannot have those documents with the security markings on that private server system,” he said.
“The taking off of the security markings is in and of itself a crime in that the removal of classification is a felony. Then transmitting the documents without security markings on the server is another felony,” diGenova detailed. “You don’t need any more evidence of criminal intent other than the establishment of the private server initially and the stripping of the classification markings later.”
‘An eruption like you cannot believe’
“The criminal case against Hillary Clinton is a no-brainer,” he concluded. “If people are not prosecuted for this server, there will be an eruption like you cannot believe within the intelligence community.
“The evidence there will be an eruption comes from Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and the NSA, who when being interviewed in August, said the ‘original sin’ of creating Hillary Clinton’s private server as the sole communications device for the secretary can never be fixed,” he said with determination. “That starts it and ends it – it’s over – the original sin of the private server creates the crime and ends the investigation. The rest is icing on the cake."
I saw that. Merkel is a menace to the free world.
I have been trying real hard, REAL hard to take Trump at his WORD, because his DEEDS do not match them.
I envy the true believers, I really do, starry eyed and blissfully ignorant as a lifelong hustler and liberal Democrat leads them down the road to perdition.
I try, but that kind of blind faith is just not in me. I am a conservative which means a pragmatists and so to me and many like me we pick Ted Cruz because he is, as Rush Limbaugh says, the closest thing we have to Reagan and he has a RECORD of conservatism.
But I will keep trying.
I saw Digenova on FBN last week and he sounded certain that a grand jury has been convened, hie wife is Victoria Toensing (sp?)
I saw that as well, not sure if it was a scowl, but Cruz certainly did not say anything. Since Fox News has had such long knives out for Cruz, my first thought was that it was staged...that FNS had shut off the feed to Cruz so he did hear Wallace and did not have a chance to say goodbye, making it look like Cruz dissed him? Did you notice that they cut back to Wallace and he moved his eyes off-camera for a moment...that was strange as well! From my experience in watching Cruz on TV, that behavior, a “scowling” non-response, was so out of character for Cruz...he has always been very respectful even when the interviewer has been a POS like Wallace was that day!
-------------------------
Just heard the Rush interview.He was awesome.
I came away with some major points from his appearance,and for a change wall-ass didn't try and mess with Rush,smart thinkging Chris.
1.Rush says that Donald Trump is basically what the Republican party has been asking for all along. Someone who can bring a bunch of different groups together and win an election. But, they don't want Trump and will do anything to get rid of him.
Later on in the interview Rush said he would not be surprised if they change the rules just to get rid of Trump but if they do there will be a huge walkout of the convention.
This only happens if Trump does not get enough delegates.
2.Rush said this is not the first time this has happened. The GOP-e also tried to get rid of Reagan at a convention and that they are run by donors not philosophy.
3.On Trump Rush says you have to deal with what you get,he may be more inclined to have Cruz as his first choice but he is not discounting the potential of Cruz. Is what I got out of the interview.
4.Marco is going nowhere he screwed himself with the gang of eight we all know that.
5.Rush thinks Cruz has limited his appeal but still sees him as a good guy,very conservative someone you can trust,not a liar,I disagree with him on Cruz but that happens.
6.Rush thinks in the end we will have a candidate and the party will unite around him.
7.Probably most important hillary is the enemy not our candidates.
Limbaugh at his finest during the interview,IMHO.
Victoria Toensing was also a Deputy Attorney General in charge of terrorism under Reagan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Toensing
The problems with this analysis is that only she and her husband Joe are speaking loudly about “there probably is” a Grand Jury impaneled. Everyone else is mum. But you rarely get a grant of immunity unless a GJ is there and a Judge overseeing the panel approves the immunity.
Don’t put too much faith in Comey. His only show of “integrity” was when he turned on W. This gave cred to Obama to put him in charge of the FBI. He has yet to win his spurs in my eyes.
Comey should have asked for an independent counsel/special prosecutor long ago.
Ugggghhh!
Really? Thanks for confirming my worst fears. So the Trump will smoke Hillary thing is a smokescreen to lull us into a false sense of security and then when he has to face someone more presidential and who doesn’t have near the unavoidable ratings, we’re all screwed.
Great.
Good analysis. Thanks!
Right now my main concern is to vote for whoever will implement policies that will give us economic growth. Trump seems to be that person, and I can put up with a lot to get the growth we need.
What will the rank and file FBI do, if there is no indictment?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
