Posted on 03/05/2016 10:41:08 PM PST by parisa
The establishment is panicked and the former Republican presidential nominee just confirmed it
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
How do YOU sound when you are angry about something...as prissy and mealy-mouthed as you write?
Just admit that you HATE Trump, ALL of his supporters, and will find fault with everything any of the above has ever said or written.
Mitt is a liar, a hypocrite, a hugs GOPEer, a FAILED pol. Of course his irrational, uncalled for diatribe against Trump, added onto all of the other incoming, had some affect. Which I'm certain delights you.
AGAIN, I’m allowed to voice an opinion and I’m going to ask you for the umpteenth time to knock off the personal attacks.
Just because someone doesn’t share your opinion, doesn’t make them stupid or uniformed or idiot. It just means they have a different opinion. There’s no conspiracy. Just folks sharing their thoughts and offering different perspectives. Make sense?
We all love our candidates as much as the next guy loves his. And in the end we’ll need to come together and vote for the nominee, assuming the establishment doesn’t steal it from us. It’s my plan to vote against Hillary regardless if my guy gets the nod or not. Isn’t it yours?
I state fact; you take those facts as "insults".
Your opinions are your own, as are mine. OTOH, your opinions are based on facts, but rather, re Judge Jeanine, only on you feelings. Your feelings are worthless and meaningless.
As I pointed out to you, you aren't qualified to opine on the Judge's opening remarks. You ignore the substance and attacked her "tone", delivery, and presentation. All of which is irrelevant!
And before you go there, yes, I do have the credentials to judge.
“Sit over there, or get out of the way” is not instruction to “get in line, or get off this site”.
To presume that the two are the same, is reaching for trouble that was never there, or a sign of real desperation.
Your inability to interpret plain English is your problem, and to replace actual words with your own rewrite leaves you in the hole, not me. You dug it.
Wow, a Cruz supporter that is rude and condescending. What a surprise /s
No, Romney all but endorsed Cruz. The GOPe would much rather have Cruz - they know they can control him. He was silent about illegals for months, at their command, until it became clear Trump was winning because of his strong stance.
I don’t care about your credentials to have an opinion, because I don’t plan on attacking you personally.
And LOL, YES, many or even MOST opinions are based on feelings. ROFL... of course they are. That’s just silly to say otherwise. I feel like she was over the top, inauthentic.... whatever.
And Calling people stupid, slow and idiots, are not facts though, they are INSULTS, whether you know it or not and you’ve done it to several people. I told you to knock it off. No I’m not your mother but I do have the right to tell you to quit attacking me personally. AGAIN, I’d appreciate it if you’d stop.
And if I personally attack “everyone” please point me to the post, if you can, and I’ll apologize.
Until then, have a good evening.
Re your "insults"...do I really need to repeat what I have previously stated about your passive/aggressive, little goody Miss two shoes, butter wouldn't melt in your mouth, oh so innocent, left handed insults? Just read all of your posts. Bless your heart.
Since it is doubtful that you have a degree in communication, journalism, theatre, nor even taken a class in logic, critical thinking, or how to write a critique, you attacked Judge Jeanine based solely on your emotions and biases.
How did you come to the decision that she was "OVER THE TOP"? Based on what? As compared to WHOM ?
As an example of expository, substance filled statement about Mittens and the GOPE.
In the end, it's your uneducated ( that's not an "insult", you are uneducated re this topic ) opinion.; but you haven't been able to explain your position. Instead, you've whinged and whined, complained about being "INSULTED", played the victim, stamped your feet, condescendingly told people what they should do, and continued to post impugnations and beratings.
I do not own this site. But I am very thankful for it. I enjoy coming here to converse about current events, history, or what have you. I do not appreciate personal attacks (no self respecting person would)and I DO have the right to ask you AGAIN for like the 6th time today, to stop.
Again, I ask you just point me to my personaln attacks on you and I’ll apologize.
I don’t think that NICELY A asking you to stop is whining. I respond in kind with insults to you, I didn’t ping anyone in an effort to tattle on you, I simply asked you to stop.
And believe it or not, people can be civil to one another. When someone is trying to be civil or nice to you, just accept it instead of assuming the the person is being a goody 2 shoes or being passive aggressive. You should allow people to be nice to you without attacking them with personal insults.
You may assume what you will about my Education, degrees, or whatever. I don’t ever mind discussing them when the subject at hand calls for it. But one is not required to have a degree in any subject in order to an opinion on a political pundit or anything they said.
I am still allowed to have my opinion, and I’m allowed to speak it here. You can’t make someone not have an opinion, by the sheer force of your will, no matter how much you try.
Supreme Court! We’ve got male, female, conservative, liberal, more liberal, socialist, commie, etc. It’s about time we had a beautiful SC judge!
>>Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
Wow, that’s a great statement of Truth! : )
That’ll work.
>>She sounded grounded, was factual and precise in her condemnations, showed that Mittens had done far worse things, than what he trashed Trump with and proved that Mittens is not only a hypocrite, but a fool for what he spewed out against Trump.
>>The fact that you are incapable of hearing and digesting what was said, proves that your biases have rendered you deaf to intelligent, cogent speech, when it isn’t against whom you disparage and impugn 24/7.
Stated powerfully and succintly.
Take any and all of THAT any way you care you, but knowing you, you shall take it all as yet again another insult. So be it; I couldn't care less if I tried.
>>If you read about George Romney who set to destroy the GOP and while running for Governor of Michigan stuck any reference to the word Republican <hated Conservatives and moneyed people like Rockefeller didn’t’ fit any where and liked Mitt Started his own party
And he also launched an aggressive attack, trying to smear and take down Ronald Reagan, at the time. The Romneys are traitors to our country’s founding principles of individual freedom and liberty.
>>The problem is the GOP has been taken over and is now run by Democrat operatives. What needs to happen is someone needs to wrest control from these Democrats and kick them out. Romney, Rubio, Jeb, all these mofos are Democrats who have absolutely no business whatsoever being in the Republican party. Get-them-the-F-out, show them the door, whatever it takes, rescind their membership so REAL Republicans can take back this party.
Yes!
Judge Jeanine was a lawyer and a very good one! Her opening, last night, was very like a closing speech to a jury and very detailed and powerful one at that.
Unlike some ex-lawyers, who are now pols, she isn't stiff, oblique, nor does she get into the weeds, so that norman people just get glazed eyes listening to her summation.
What Every Voter Needs to Know about Ted Cruz:
Special report reveals Ted Cruz’s True Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXcYCwaBKnQ
and Stefan Molyneux
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtL41Pr2d5s
I believe Ted is firmly entrenched in the GOPe. He is playing the part carefully mapped out by Karl Rove. They selected him as the pretend conservative because he has a college reputation of arguing the opposite side so persuasively. But, in the above-listed video links, he has been exposed to be disingenuous.
Of course, you don’t see it that way, I understand. But others see what you don’t see. That’s why we disagree. It’s not that people haven’t “kept up”, it’s that they view things differently.
Hi,
You had asked for information re: the Mississippi Strategy:
The first YouTube link is to an outfit called Next News which I could find nothing about on the Net except for links back to their own website. Wikipedia never heard of them, neither had CNet.com.
Looking at the internal evidence, the video was set up as a head-to-head comparison of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump, but it only talked about the many questionable positions and actions and connections of Ted Cruz.
There is also a grindingly repetitive accusation that Ted is in league with NAFTA, CAFTA, SPP and NWO forces of darkness -- I agree they're forces of darkness, but the accusation rests on two points,
My opinion of the first linked website, then, is that it's campaign material created by IT professionals for Donald Trump. Which is fine as far as it goes, but Trump's own statements are IMHO guiding as to his opinion of Ted Cruz. I'll take the horse's mouth for $400, Alex.
The second link, to a Stefan Molyneux (he's a Canadian anarchist, secular materialist and humanist, and accused cultist: search him online, starting with Wiki; he's fascinating in his own right, but he ain't Harvard Law) discussion of Cruz's career and eligibility, is partial and partisan in the same way; we are to conclude that Ted Cruz is a snaky, nasty guy who is categorically ineligible for the Presidency under Article II of the Constitution, and oh by the way he's lying on immigration (that's a construction by Molyneux, one which is congruent with Trump's and probably got him the gig bashing Cruz).
Be in no doubt: Molyneux lays Ted waste, there's not much left when he's done. But at the same time, it's like getting bitched out by Chris Hitchens or Al Gore: Do I really care? One's an atheist, and dead (which may mean he isn't an atheist anymore, but I leave that to you), and the other one might as well be.
I finally managed to get through this thing. Glad I did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.