Posted on 03/05/2016 10:41:08 PM PST by parisa
The establishment is panicked and the former Republican presidential nominee just confirmed it
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
She earned my respect when she announced she was a concealed weapons carrier and demanded firearms rights in New York. She stood up for all gun rights that day and didn’t back down. Because she did that many other came out for gun rights too.
Is not! Doesn't look over 40, at least not on my little Android phone.
Just got word on ABC News that Nancy Reagan has died at 94 ..... still in love with Ronnie.
You bet. That defines one or two who showed up on this thread el perfecto. The judge lady hit the ten ring and wound up ringing their bells hard.
New and different take .... I don't think Trump's running for business reasons (that'd be a first, even the notorious grafter Chester Arthur backed into the presidency).
Wow. More personal attacks.
Why am I not surprised.
Try to focus on the matters at hand instead of attacking others personally. Good advice for all of us.
No personal attack. This was directed right at you.
“Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth”
And you not getting it clearly indicates you’re likely a bit slow or are just playing the stupid role.
And that’s how it should be...
Even though, it’s contradictory to your other statement, I’m glad you’ve decided to correct course.
It’s really what’s best for all of.. keeping focused also on what really matters.
I already addressed that statement very succinctly.
You seem bent to keep up the personal attacks.
Says more about you than me.
We cab just leave it at that.
Oh, come on. This isn't Soviet Russia, where everything used to be figured on the angles to a fare-thee-well.
Being a Cruz supporter (like me) is not determinative of everything else in life, such as whether a TV judge or a real judge or a beauty-pageant judge did a good job of given old Mittens the springtime oyster-harvesting he needed.
There used to be some kind of rule on FR about not letting fistfights spill over from one thread to another, or following people around strewing caltrops underfoot and sending them hate-mail. I hope it's still there.
I read the same critique you did, and I saw the same vid and noticed some of the same things about it that Captain Obvious might beg to bring to our attention. That all said, I don't think DrewsMum was engaging in any carom-shooting grousing about Donald Trump. This was about Mittens and the GOP-e trying to put an elbow in the scales and play God with outcomes, and Judge Pirro's pretty effective putdown of the Mittbot.
Oh, and that "Get in line or get off the site" stuff doesn't cut it either, RitaOK; the only person who has the right to lay down a defi like that is the proprietor, whose guests we all are. Do you mind?
Totally true!
A couple of weeks ago, O’Gasbag had both Varney and Dobbs on for a segment. Those to guys eviscerated O’Gasbag. I'll bet you he will never have them back again!
Stop playing the victim. This was your quote above. Did ya happen to notice 95 percent of everyone who viewed the video here thought it was truthful and accurate except you and maybe one other?
This is glaring stuff mumma. I just jumps right out.
Well bless your heart, you should take your own advice.
You dish it out, but you sure can’t take it!
I do take that advice. Fresh air and a little off is good for everyone. It’s easy for us to forget though...myself included.
We need to not burn ourselves out with outrage though... we’ll need all our strength to fight the liberals in the fall, regardless who the nominee is. Right?
You are free to quote where I disagreed with her statement.
It was kind of her method that was a turn off.
And I don’t look around at the opinion of others before I decide what mine is. That is what followers do. I simply gave my opinion of the subject. You don’t have to agree of course. I respect your opinion, I would hope you would do the same.
I see, so you totally agree with the judge, but feel she’s inauthentic and dislike her delivery and anger? Is this accurate mumma?
She sounded off the rails. Like she was trying too hard. It came off as inauthentic.
You are one of the most disingenuous individuals on this site.
Yes. I agree with what she said. In my opinion, and the opinion of many others, it was a little too showy and yes it came off as inauthentic. Almost like she was trying to mirror the image of the “angry” Trump supporter. She maybe overdid it a little.
And that’s ok. Again, it helps no one but the ones already supporting DT. I also believe Mitts comments did nothing but reinforce the folks in the establishment. He’s not as influential as he thinks he is....
Just my honest opinion. An honest, albeit unpopular opinion doesn’t make one disingenuous. Maybe you should look that word up. I don’t think it means what you think it does.
She ripped Mitt a new one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.