Posted on 03/05/2016 10:41:08 PM PST by parisa
The establishment is panicked and the former Republican presidential nominee just confirmed it
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Righteous anger! I love it! I don’t think she missed any of the kitchen sinks that have been thrown. After that, I hope she doesn’t disappear from Fox News but it wouldn’t surprise me.
“Can you point to me on this doll where the bad woman touched and hurt you?”
lolololololololooooolol
Elsie ewez coot n fuffy...
:)
Both barrels - point blank range!
BOO-YA!
That is hilarious.
The problem is the GOP has been taken over and is now run by Democrat operatives. What needs to happen is someone needs to wrest control from these Democrats and kick them out. Romney, Rubio, Jeb, all these mofos are Democrats who have absolutely no business whatsoever being in the Republican party. Get-them-the-F-out, show them the door, whatever it takes, rescind their membership so REAL Republicans can take back this party.
I’m surprised Faux news, the official channel of Donald Trump bashing, allowed this to be broadcast
Whoa, that was a beating! And deservedly so!
GREAT post!
I expected her to attack the contents of Romney’s attacks against Trump. She didn’t. In fact, the whole thing was deflection. I agree with most of what she said, but it is not a support of Trump at all. Rather, it is an attack against Romney.
That’s fine, but it sort of misses the point. The problems with Trump are real, and she didn’t address whether or not those things brought up by romney against Trump were true. Her whole argument was “you can’t say anything because you’re bad too.”
That’s true of everyone.
The fact is that a strong argument can be made that Trump’s MO would quickly lead to WWIII.
And the fact is that the very things people really hope Trump will do are also covered by Cruz. And he definitely is more of a statesman and understands how a president can accomplish things better than Trump does.
There are two anti-establishment candidates. One has the temperament to deal with the geopolitical environment of 2016 and beyond. They other just wants things his way, and will try to use tactics that, though they may work in the business world, can be downright dangerous when you CAN’T walk away from the deal, and ticking off the other side CAN lead to very dire consequences indeed.
But then, maybe that’s what the Lord has in mind for us anyway, as he did Germany in the 1930’s, and Russia in 1917.
Times change. People don’t.
Her whole rant was name calling. It was done very well. But notice she never said the things Mitt said about Trump were false. She just argued, with venom, that Mitt has no right to voice his opinion on the subject.
As an American, the first amendment protects his right to share, as it does hers.
I’ve enjoyed her rants when she stays on the facts and avoids ad-hominem. Listening to this one, however, I was embarassed for her. I guess her deadline was approaching and she had to come up with SOMETHING, such that it was.
Jane long, doughty one
Is there a transcript?
Later
Woah, i need to read what she said!
(Need transcript; am severely hearing impaired....)
Note tagline.
Her opening comments scalded Mitts! She was fantastic!
She could eat crackers in my bed anytime, but I sure wouldn’t want to make her mad at me. lol That lady has an attitude!
I’m wavering on whether she’s a Trump supporter or just someone else who thinks Romney is an ass for his speech content.
excellent
She’s good!
“I heard her. She sounded off the rails. Like she was trying too hard. It came off as inauthentic. I guess she’s reaching for ratings and hopes her rant goes viral because everyone loves an angry speech....grrrrr!”
Since you’re a biased Cruzbot who trolls Trump threads and won’t get off them, we’ll take your comment for what it’s worth.
Nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.