Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Bernardino District Attorney strangely claims suspect’s iPhone contains a ‘cyber pathogen’
9 to 5 Mac ^ | March 5, 2016 | by Benjamin Mayo

Posted on 03/05/2016 8:44:52 AM PST by Swordmaker

Viruses aren’t biological, they don’t just live dormant inside a phone. They have to be used, activated or deployed. Zdziarski says he thinks the District Attorney is trying to claim that the shooter was trying to compromise the local San Bernardino IT network with a virus of some kind, but the language used in the filing is just factually incorrect and likely misleading to the court. There is also seemingly no other evidence that would lead investigator’s to believe such a claim.

If a serious computer virus did exist on the device with the phone acting as a host of some kind, then the device would have to be jailbroken anyway. This is clearly not the case as otherwise the Apple/FBI iPhone unlock court fiasco would not be necessary.

The iPhone does not allow for PF_INET and SOCK_RAW, or other kinds of low level packets, to be used from within the app sandbox. It’s unlikely that Fagan knows this, however, and so his dramatic statements are actually damaging the FBI’s case, because the device would likely have to be jailbroken. Apple’s sandbox will simply not allow an application to abuse the network stack in such a way that would make a “cyber pathogen” feasible. The kind of dramatic network attack that the DA is trying to sell to Judge Pym would have to be big. Popular ports such as metasploit require a jailbroken device to work for this (and other) reasons, and any tool to inject something this serious would need the same.

If this filing is meant as a scaremongering tactic to sway court feeling towards the FBI argument, then it’s not a great one: any inspection by an expert reveals the blatant weaknesses in the argument. It could also be the honest opinion of someone who is simply not educated in technology, in which case it will also likely get disregarded once Apple’s lawyers get a chance to comment in court.

The Apple/FBI court fight begins on March 22nd, a day after Apple’s rumored media event where the company will unveil a new 4-inch iPhone, a 9.7 inch iPad Pro and an Apple Watch refresh. Tech companies including Google, Facebook, Snapchat, Microsoft and Dropbox have all submitted amicus briefs defending Apple’s position. Apple is keeping a complete list of filings that support Apple’s argument on its website.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apple; applefbi; applepinglist; farook; iphone; privacy

1 posted on 03/05/2016 8:44:52 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“The iPhone does not allow for PF_INET and SOCK_RAW, or other kinds of low level packets, to be used from within the app sandbox.”

So a terrorist can only use code from the authorized sandbox?


2 posted on 03/05/2016 9:01:53 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored; ShadowAce; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; ...
San Bernardino DA jumps the shark in his desperation to force Apple to open the terrorists' iPhone. District Attorney Michael Ramos is now claiming that it is imperative that Apple MUST open the SUBJECT DEVICE because he suspects it may hold a "cyber pathogen lying-dormant" that could be released to wreck havoc on San Bernardino's infrastructure and the only way to find out whether or not this evil software is hidden on the iPhone is for Apple to assist in opening it up to find it! Ramos' Amicus Curia filing went on to absurdly argue:
""Companies that introduce dangerous products, and it can be argued that the iPhone with its current encryption is dangerous to victims, are required to fix them. Companies that create environmental damage are required to clean it up,"

. . . trying to make the bizarre connection that the encrypted iOS ecosystem of locked iPhones and iPads which law enforcement and other agencies such as his cannot get into at will, is the equivalent of a dangerous to the public, toxic environmental spill. That is really absurd. — PING!

Pinging dayglored and Shadow Ace for the most absurd legal theory ever. . .


San Bernardino District Attorney:
Apple's iPhone secure ecosystem
is equivalent of Toxic Spill?
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

3 posted on 03/05/2016 9:05:27 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Idiot...


4 posted on 03/05/2016 9:08:45 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“Don’t try to understand ‘em, just ride n rope n brand ‘em...”


5 posted on 03/05/2016 9:10:10 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

cyber pathogen lying-dormant.....

Need to work that into an E-mail sometime. :)


6 posted on 03/05/2016 9:20:58 AM PST by moose07 (DMCS (Dit Me Cong San ) - Nah. Put the Cheese down and step away.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

“That is really absurd.”

Beware the absurd becoming the standard.

In _Raich_, SCOTUS ruled the interstate commerce clause allowed the feds to prohibit state-legal intrastate activity which REDUCED demand for ILLEGAL interstate commerce.


7 posted on 03/05/2016 9:31:16 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
So a terrorist can only use code from the authorized sandbox?

I just can't picture them making it through the approval process to be included on the App Store. . . but if it did happen. . .

(warning, really bad sick humor follows)

It would have to be a new Apple App Store category: Terrorist and ISIS Apps.

I can see the new sandboxed iPhone and iPad apps now.

Of course, the authorized sandbox on the iPhone is called the Sahara. . .

On the other hand there IS an ISIS Android store. . .

8 posted on 03/05/2016 10:22:41 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Ars Technica has a follow up article where the San Bernardino DA admits he made it up. . . but then he doubles-down and later claims the same thing to the press. Link only due to copyright considerations:

What is a “lying-dormant cyber pathogen?” San Bernardino DA says it’s made up
He now says there's no evidence of cyber doom, wants iPhone unlocked to be sure.
Ars Technica—by David Kravets (US) — Mar 5, 2016 2:30am PST

9 posted on 03/05/2016 10:28:46 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

The Iphone has a cyber pathogen but I killed it with a hammer.


10 posted on 03/05/2016 10:35:20 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Obama Rules of Entanglement: Hands up Don't Shoot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
In _Raich_, SCOTUS ruled the interstate commerce clause allowed the feds to prohibit state-legal intrastate activity which REDUCED demand for ILLEGAL interstate commerce.

You have to remember that Lawyers take classes in straining at gnats, getting camels through the eyes of needles, and they learn how to start discussing a herd of elephants and by the time they're finished the subject has been converted into a single mouse.

There are too many Liberal Attorneys sitting on benches reading invisible ink between the words and lines of very plainly written English words and sentences.

I've been running into a couple on FR who seem to be prime candidates for taking some of their places on those benches as word and sentence jugglers.

They can find entire pages of additional orders and clauses between the last word of a sentence and the period in the Court Order compelling Apple to open that iPhone. Things such as Apple gets to keep the iPhone forever and three days (that's an exaggeration of their claims), to Apple doesn't have to give the FBI the software, to Apple is permitted to destroy the software after opening the device, to one who claimed that Apple could destroy both the iPhone and the software afterward, to Apple can use any technique at all to open the phone they want without government approval. They will argue themselves blue in the face that the order includes what they see there, but will never produce the exact words they claim to have found.

They'll claim those words and orders are easy for any "smart person" to see or that they've already posted them and all anyone has to do is read what they've already posted, but they never rise to actually respond to a timely verbatim quote from the order itself.

11 posted on 03/05/2016 10:48:33 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
The Iphone has a cyber pathogen but I killed it with a hammer.


San Bernardino DA Office Souvenir Cyber Pathogen Killer

12 posted on 03/05/2016 10:53:51 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Insert two aspirins into the charger and call me in the morning.


13 posted on 03/05/2016 10:54:20 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
ATT00043
14 posted on 03/05/2016 2:21:49 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
San Bernadino DA

Does DA stand for Dumb Ass?

15 posted on 03/05/2016 2:37:13 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson