Posted on 03/03/2016 5:49:13 PM PST by C19fan
Foam coming out of his...whatever.
Who in their right mind would put any money on the losing horse in the race. That’s just dumb.
...and Cruz has a homosexual Manhattan couple bankrolling him.
It must be quite a feat for Cruz to be Bi-Sexual in his fundraising morals.
#NYValues
Isn’t this just faabulous !!!!
No surprise there.
All queer all the time..........
Oh, buhrother.
Well God help Rubio. This has fast turned into a tragicomedy of errors.
If we had to name the most un-gay person in the contest... it’s probably Donald Trump. Macho, yes... gay no.
The point is to be fabulous, maybe. I have hoped that some of these rumors are only exaggerated stories, but on the other hand the popular spiritual resistance to whatever is moving the gay crowd seems to be at a spectacular low today.
So Cruz has Jeb’s finance team and now this.
I suspect this has less to do with get Rubio the nomination than it does slowing down Trump's ascent to the top. As long as the GOP race is in question, they will keep throwing negatives at each other (sadly, with lots of free help from FR) while keeping Trump away from Hillary full-time.
His Party Boy past has paid dividends for him.
so what? trump donated to lgtb group and his hotels are lgtb friendly
Exactly. Someone who has more money than sense.
You cannot realistically expect to see any significant changes when your candidate’s staff is comprised of people who created the system, are part of the problem or profit greatly from the existing system.
Are gay rumours about little Marco still out there?
SINGER???!!!!!! Has the RNC lost its mind???
And Trump’s campaign manager is a pro-amnesty guy who got Rubio to flip on the issue.
Cruz has the most pro-family policy and position.
He did not change his position for the homosexuals who support him. He believes issues related to homosexuality and marriage should be determined at the state level.
I personally do not agree, but it may be the most social conservatives can hope for.
Cruz also is clearly on the side of those who do not want to compromise their religious beliefs to cooperate with homosexual weddings, etc.
You can argue over whether he should take their money. I would not, but that is a decision that he has to make.
Interesting point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.