Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: centurion316

“OK. Then please provide me with the definition of Natural Born Citizen from the language of the Constitution.”

You already know where to look, but you refuse to. Nothing I can do to force you.

Again, no court has the power or authority to redefine the meaning of the words of the Constitution. If we grant them that power, then the Constitution may as well not exist, for men will soon reinterpret it into meaningless scribblings.

The Framers didn’t define any terms in the Constitution. They wrote it in the clear language of the day. If we modern people are befuddled and confused about what those simple words mean, there is a remedy. Pick up an 18th century dictionary and look them up.

I think the founding generation would be astounded at how ignorant and incapable of simple problem solving their progeny have become. We’re practically unworthy to call them our ancestors.


231 posted on 03/01/2016 5:44:04 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

Of course I know, English Common Law as SCOTUS has pointed out several times. By that measure, both Cruz and Rubio are eligible.

Are you this passionate about the 10th Amendment? Interesting that no one seems to get upset about blatant disregard about that part of the Constitution.

Nice talking with you.


232 posted on 03/01/2016 6:13:31 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson