Pathetic.
Maybe so, but unless I see evidence to the contrary, i'll still trust his opinion more than that of the entire Gleichschaltung stampeded herd of the tech-industry. (Mostly located in Apple country)
Also your argument is a fallacy of the form "argumentum ad populum". It's basically saying that the guy in the picture I previously posted is wrong because everyone else disagrees with him.
No, my argument was a form of “argument from authority”. It is not always reliable (particularly if the “authority” is an expert on the wrong subject for the case at hand), but it’s generally a good guide if you stay alert for the pitfalls.
When the population that disagrees with him is composed of EXPERTS in their fields, yeah, it's not argumentum ad populum." That's fallacy assumes the populum is IGNORANT and following based on the crowd's momentum. It does not assume that they do so because of their expertise. Again, your presentation of an anonymous anecdotal claim does NOT trump expert claims of people who are willing to stand up and sign their letters of opposition or testify before a tribunal, even under oath. There's a big difference from your guy on a telephone talking to you under conditions of anonymity.