Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham

Rush is so far avoiding the subject of his dining with Chuck U and lowering his amnesty content.

He is just saying he has always been against amnesty. Um, no one said he wasn’t. The Times just said he even ATTENDED these wine and dines. The Rush I thought I knew would never have gone, and would have reported it the next day.

If all he is going to do is say that he was always against amnesty, that is a non sequitur.

Did you attend these schumer dinners? Do you lie by omission to your listeners???? Come on Rush. Did you go with schumer or not?


45 posted on 02/29/2016 9:14:50 AM PST by Yaelle (We finally have a strong, courageous leader who likes US, the People!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

<< The Rush I thought I knew would never have gone, and would have reported it the next day. >>

He doesn’t even have dinners with people he likes! Much less any member of the opposition - and in this case, one of our mortal enemies.


55 posted on 02/29/2016 9:18:43 AM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

He said he did go, but he didn’t agree...any 24/7 members check it..


157 posted on 02/29/2016 9:49:21 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson