[Exit148]

“””””The point is that for all of you New York Times supportbots to trash Rush for eating a supper with political opponents is the most asinine syllogism I’ve heard on hear. The discussion of political positions on amnesty is just that. And there is no evidence from any remarks made by Rush, that he is in support of amnesty.”””””

Hear Hear!! As Rush said, if he had agreed on amnesty, THAT would have been the main point in the NYTimes “story”

[turducken]

The point is he spent 3 hours dining with Schumer and then turns around and trashes him on national radio

Cant you see this is a farce? It is all an act, the elites are the same whether left or right and Rush just got busted!

[nutmeg]

Hear Hear!! As Rush said, if he had agreed on amnesty, THAT would have been the main point in the NYTimes “story”

Amen, FRiend. Gotta run now... have a great day. :-)

[dforest]

I can say Rush has said he doesn’t like amnesty. Fine.

Then why would Rush pimp a big amnesty supporter like Rubio?

You know, the guy who told Telemundo, in Spanish by the way, that he would grant amnesty before border protection?

Makes no sense.