I’m beginning to see why Trump is frustrated enough to want libel suits ramped up. I vehemently disagree with him, but talk about ‘immune to data’.
Trump critics are arguably more immune to data than Trump supporters.
First off, Trump University. His critics are immune to this truth ...
TRUMP UNIVERSITY HAS A 98% APPROVAL RATING
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3402515/posts
The dirty little secret is that crony politics attempts to destroy upstart colleges with unfair standards, double standards, etc.
~~~~
Secondly ...
The abuse the poor Poles suffered under Trump.
Guess what? My work conditions and pay were a lot worse than theirs back in the 80s, not to mention they were defectors from the Soviet bloc.
Not that any Trump critic ever bothers to listen or care, the only reason they were illegal immigrants was because democrats hate Christians who know the truth about communism. They prefer immigrants who hate Christians, hate liberty, and join street gangs.
I've never cited it.
Guess what? My work conditions and pay were a lot worse than theirs back in the 80s, not to mention they were defectors from the Soviet bloc.
Doing demolition work in a building with asbestos without dust masks is BS. I used one in the '70s. You can go to hell with that one.
Not that any Trump critic ever bothers to listen or care, the only reason they were illegal immigrants was because democrats hate Christians who know the truth about communism. They prefer immigrants who hate Christians, hate liberty, and join street gangs.
Cut with the projected reality. You don't know for a fact the real reason any more than anybody else does. That kind of fabricated "data" has become stock and trade for Trumpsters. The bottom line is that they were illegal, he imported them, paid them bottom dollar, for 12-7 work without overtime BECAUSE they were illegal. He even screwed some of them out of final paychecks. The only reason he wasn't criminally busted was that he set up a subcontractor who had never done that kind of work (IIRC a painter) to do the demolition, sign paperwork, and protect him from those liabilities. So cut with the "Mr. Nice Guy" crap. Trump was out to make money, period.
As for your sophistry quoting his immigration plan as if I hadn't read it, now you've pissed me off. You know damned well I've addressed and cited it, BECAUSE YOU SAID SO.
That is data.
Trump's plan has a loophole the size of Montana. He's repeated it in a national debate. The result will be that MILLIONS of current illegals will get to be "legal," as he has said MANY times. That means they will eventually vote, they will continue to wreck our schools and overload our social services for which they would then qualify in even greater numbers. That will result in conservatives being irrelevant to Trump, at which point he can go back to being a Democrat and may even run as one, as many of his policies make obvious.
NEVER ONCE has a Trump supporter confronted those data, and I have posted them MANY times. Even you, after your first comment, ignored the import.
Meanwhile, Cruz has since said publically he will be deporting illegals, and he has said he will bar them from ever having a way back in unless they leave before they are caught. That gives his plan the substantive demographic edge it lacked when I did the analysis, although he had implied as much.
When are you going to get that I am not a "Cruz" supporter? I am a Trump opponent. I defend either when warranted (in Trump's case it is rare). I criticize either when warranted. I stand for conservative policy, period.