Posted on 02/25/2016 8:38:27 PM PST by TigerClaws
In communist countries and other dictatorships, there IS a litmus test. Dissent from the party is forbidden. Those who are so foolish as to think for themselves obviously lack common sense and should be kept from disrupting the calming unity of the collective. Preach it, comrade!
Peace,
SR
I have a feeling you might hit the next nomination. Unfortunately, it would probably land you in jail.
Do you live in a bubble? This forum is a very, very, small faction of the voters in this country., Who cares if you vote for our country to collapse? It doesn’t seem to bother you one bit - because of your so-called purity or whatever the heck you call it. Once we are truly invaded - then this forum will be gone - the foreigners will overtake us as they are slowly doing. Wise up you foolish person!
Love to see the headlines Ted Trumped in Texas.
A guy named @Bidenshairplugs has been digging this stuff up. He’s great, if you have tolerance for a lot of vulgarity.
They hired the same “Convincing John” guy that Obama has for that Mconnel meeting.
LOL. “Other than continuing the complete destruction of America, Rubio’s alright!”
Ouch. I didn’t take this serious.
If that really is true, I see Ted is really wedded to the border issue. /s
Man what a melt-down.
This should get him an additional -10% in Texas.
Your wrong. There is a real fight here with Cruz in the center and he doesn’t lose. I’ll explain why, and why your point of view may be wrong. In the top tier we have three candidates: Trump, Cruz, and Rubio. Now let’s say there are four real lanes in the Republican Primary. Clearly both Cruz and Trump fall in the outsider lane. Clearly both Cruz and Rubio fall in the Consevative lane. (in addition Rubio falls in the Establishment lane-and to a degree so does Trump). Cruz can thread both the outsider and Consevative lanes, he’s against a Trump at the moment because Trump is in #1. It’s simple math #2 and #3 team up. It’s simple math in game theory. Just saying.
I swear I had this Cruz is GOPe thing in the back of my mind this whole time and couldn’t nail it down. Here we go.
I’ll admit, he sure hid it well.
While I did think there was grounds to be very leery of the Goldman Sachs connection, and the CFR connection, I didn’t give them top billing.
Now it becomes clear, providing he did say he’d go Rubio over Trump. Wow. That’s major IMO.
Fox News played the videos of Trump advocating for single payer health insurance and specifically mentioned Canada and Scotland as great examples of socialized medicine, and that he is a liberal on the issue.
So, exactly when was Trump lying?
Cruz knows Rubio is going to from out before Cruz and Cruz was simply giving Rubio’s supporters a good reason to move to the Cruz camp.
Sorry, Cruz just went over into the establishment lane. He’s out of gas.
Trump has been advocated for a private sector replacement to Obamacare.
In years past he did say positive things bout Canada and Scotland’s health care systems.
He’s not advocating anything like that here now, and hasn’t been since he announced.
A few days ago he said those types of plans would not work here.
What a pity they didn’t play the restof what he said.
After what Ted said tonight he won’t be taking Texas.
Then Donnie has no idea about what is in the plan because he definitely can speak to it.
Another thought about Cruz's saying he prefers Rubio. If they work together, that's a Cuban/American and a Canadian/Cuban/American, both without definitive answers about their NBC status, trying to take over the US presidency. That doesn't sit well, especially since one of our biggest concerns is that we're losing our national identity to globalism.
That’s what you say, but not what the majority of Cruz supporters will think.
I fail to see how one GOPe uniparty hack endorsing another is news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.