If calling someone delusional and willfully blind as you did to me does not qualify as name calling, I will leave you to your alternate reality. Bye.
That's quite a defense mechanism you've got going there: if, during the course of a discussion, somebody says something critical of your position, or characterizes your perception in a negative way, that's suddenly "name-calling".
How very convenient.
I don't get accused of name-calling very often, and that's probably because reasonable people don't hysterically retreat to that accusation when subjected to a mildly (or even harshly) critical statement.
"Trumpbot", "Trumpet", "Cruzbot", etc.: that's name-calling.
You need to learn to distinguish between bona fide name-calling versus engaging in an energetic (or even heated) discussion.
So, once again, I reject your false accusation...