Posted on 02/20/2016 7:37:44 AM PST by tatown
Game time.
I do not think it is feasible.
Let border states do it, WE ARE THE WALL
That would be Mrs. Trump. :-)
Not to rain on the parade, but I remember Michael Moore peeing his pants in excitement when the lines never ended during the Bush/Kerry election. He thought for sure the long lines meant Kerry was winning in a landslide. The left wing had already started celebrating.
OMG, it was so much fun to watch the leftists when they discovered all those voters were for Bush.
That was a great year.
He's got good taste.
Certainly better than ¿Jeb? or Bubba.
...or Obama.
So you’re saying Trump like child molesters.
Jim Robinson says he's voting for Cruz, but would support Trump if Cruz loses.
I would not oppose Cruz on SCOTUS because he is well suited by education and experience, but I would question that he would be another Justice Scalia. Scalia was a textualist, which is to say, a very strict originalist when it comes to the Constitution. Textualism means “the plain text of a statute is used to determine the meaning of the legislation. Instead of attempting to determine statutory purpose or legislative intent”. Cruz has not shown much regard for textualism or originalism in his comments on his own citizenship status. I’m not a lawyer, but I would have much more respect for Cruz if he’d said “I realize there is ambiguity on this issue and I am seeking to resolve it by putting myself before a federal court before announcing that I am running for President. That way everyone will know that I am eligible to serve if elected”.
He's followed on Twitter by one of Trump's spokesmen, or, actually, spokeswomen, and seems to have some tie to the Trump campaign though he just describes himself as "a huge Trump supporter!"
Now what was it you said? I knew Jim waits till much later to endourse anyone, you didn’t? This is all I can find and Jim Robinson is with Trump also...
Ted Cruz: South Carolina Will Be Like Iowa
â2â/â19â/â2016â â7â:â13â:â06â âPM · 92 of 130
Jim Robinson to Dead Dog
I think weâre going to know a whole lot more after tomorrow, after next week and for sure after super Tuesday. I swore to myself that we were not going to repeat the process we went through in the last two presidential election cycles where we tore down all our leading candidates and were left with the sure-loser dregs, McCain and Romney. That would be Bush or Rubio in this cycle. No thanks.
I love Cruz, but Iâm not going to try to destroy Trump. Trump is leading for a reason. Heâs destroying the establishment and the media. And doing a hell of a great job of it. If Trump were to leave the race today, there would be a huge vacuum and you can bet your bottom dollar that the Cruz-hating GOP and their big donors and the media would crucify Cruz to fill that void with Rubio or Bush. And they have the money, the power and the ink to do it.
So far, they have not been able to lay a glove on Trump. Thatâs because he doesnât need their money or their power or their ink. Heâs backed by the rebellious anti-establishment movement that is growing daily to support his campaign.
If Trump wins this thing it will be because the majority of the tea party rebels, the evangelicals, the conservatives, the Republican base, the independents and a sufficient number of blue collar voters, minorities and others who might normally vote democrat have coalesced behind him. Itâd be great if this movement were growing behind Cruz, but that does not appear to be the case.
I love Cruz, but if Trump gets the nomination I will support him to the hilt over whichever godless, America-hating Marxist/fascist totalitarian they have running on the democrat ticket.
Thank you. Thankyouverymuch.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:jimrobinson/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Ted Cruz: South Carolina Will Be Like Iowa
â2â/â19â/â2016â â7â:â13â:â06â âPM · 92 of 130
Jim Robinson to Dead Dog
I think weâre going to know a whole lot more after tomorrow, after next week and for sure after super Tuesday. I swore to myself that we were not going to repeat the process we went through in the last two presidential election cycles where we tore down all our leading candidates and were left with the sure-loser dregs, McCain and Romney. That would be Bush or Rubio in this cycle. No thanks.
I love Cruz, but Iâm not going to try to destroy Trump. Trump is leading for a reason. Heâs destroying the establishment and the media. And doing a hell of a great job of it. If Trump were to leave the race today, there would be a huge vacuum and you can bet your bottom dollar that the Cruz-hating GOP and their big donors and the media would crucify Cruz to fill that void with Rubio or Bush. And they have the money, the power and the ink to do it.
So far, they have not been able to lay a glove on Trump. Thatâs because he doesnât need their money or their power or their ink. Heâs backed by the rebellious anti-establishment movement that is growing daily to support his campaign.
If Trump wins this thing it will be because the majority of the tea party rebels, the evangelicals, the conservatives, the Republican base, the independents and a sufficient number of blue collar voters, minorities and others who might normally vote democrat have coalesced behind him. Itâd be great if this movement were growing behind Cruz, but that does not appear to be the case.
I love Cruz, but if Trump gets the nomination I will support him to the hilt over whichever godless, America-hating Marxist/fascist totalitarian they have running on the democrat ticket.
Thank you. Thankyouverymuch.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:jimrobinson/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
Typical Cruz-like spin.
Everyone should read with Jim Robinson actually said.
You post is slanted..see mine
My point and question still stands...how about being truthful to yourself, so you get the best answer that matches what you believe, instead of getting the outcome you think you should? Poll, quiz, test, whatever....I would think wanting to know which candidate actually truly lines of with your personal beliefs and convictions, would be more important, than having it align with the candidate you worship.
At least it does for....maybe your values aren’t that high.
Good grief! Where do they get this stuff? There really shouldn’t be wifi access in insane asylums.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.