[jessduntno]

You: “Ah. So a Judge can declare anything, and it is so.”

Me: In this particular case, yes. yes they can.

You: “No, no he can’t. That’s why there are appeals. Which is what Apple is doing.”

Hahahahahaha. No, you didn’t say they could’t be compelled.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmph. Run along Junior.

They don’t need to “invent” anything. They need to keep the autodestruct from being triggered. Thier head manly man has already conceded that culd be done. And since you didn’t read it the first time, they didn’t ask for anything but a ram memory only card for that one usit. The court also gave them the option of keeping possession of it and the FBI would run the routine AFTER the lockout was removed from remote, keeping no part of it.

You don’t know dick about what your talking about and even worse, you don’t read what you whine about being posted over and over. What waste of bandwidth you are.

[LexBaird]

They don't need to "invent" anything. They need to keep the autodestruct from being triggered.

And how, oh sage, do you suggest they do that without inventing a method to do so? Pull it out of thin air? Wave a magic wand? How are they to produce this RAM card, without creating the software on it, which Apple says does not currently exist?

There ain't no such beast as "one-use" software. Once it is developed, it won't be undeveloped. That's like demanding a recipe be formulated to bake one cake. This isn't about making the cake, it's about being forced to create the recipe, because if that is done, everyone will want cake. The government is big on forcing people to bake cake.