Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

“I’ll take that as a tacit admission that you agree with Apple’s contention that a system created to unlock this particular i-phone, would be a system that would unlock the others.”

Well, you can twist it anyway you want to, but that is not what I said. The fact that it was obvious what would happen if they had it in their possession says nothing about what would happen if they didn’t. Not too good on comprehension, or do you just see what you want to see? My answer is my answer. It is not open to interpretation.


213 posted on 02/19/2016 10:49:30 PM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump, (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NY) /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno
If you thought Apple had the ability to design a system that would unlock this one phone only, you would say so since it would expose Tim Cook as a liar.

So you refuse to say one way or the other.

214 posted on 02/19/2016 11:29:57 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson