“I’ll take that as a tacit admission that you agree with Apple’s contention that a system created to unlock this particular i-phone, would be a system that would unlock the others.”
Well, you can twist it anyway you want to, but that is not what I said. The fact that it was obvious what would happen if they had it in their possession says nothing about what would happen if they didn’t. Not too good on comprehension, or do you just see what you want to see? My answer is my answer. It is not open to interpretation.
So you refuse to say one way or the other.