Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer
I'm not trying to equate the two, and you know it, or you should if you give my expression the ordinary meaning.

The only protection I've given the author is that his bullshit piece will persuade some people against Cruz. You can of course disagree with my opinion on that point, but if you persist in misleading about MY position, then civility betrween us will die suddenly, and I'll make a point to make it interesting for the readers. You have been warned.

72 posted on 02/18/2016 6:44:16 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
You can of course disagree with my opinion on that point, but if you persist in misleading about MY position, then civility betrween us will die suddenly, and I'll make a point to make it interesting for the readers. You have been warned.

I, sir, am not the one issuing threats here. I expressed my opinion the two had no relevancy to each other and you said my opinion meant nothing and then proceeded down a 'what if' path and added you felt Cruz was 'ineligible'. Ineligible for what?

I mislead nothing and made no threats.

75 posted on 02/18/2016 6:52:55 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson