Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Helicondelta

“Which law?”

Complying with a legal warrant. Try to keep up, will you? If they do not have the technology to undo it, they are stupider than stupid, they are dangerous. No one with a basic understanding of law and business would build such a thing for mass consumer markets. Only a child would believe otherwise. A stupid child. A technical oversight is one thing, something that can thwart the Constitution is quite another. Something that would give the gift of unbreakable communications would be on a par with the enigma machine that the Germans unleashed on us. Try to think how that impacted the war and hastened the death of MILLIONS.


81 posted on 02/17/2016 7:38:15 PM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NEW YORK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

“Complying with a legal warrant.”

And the whole idea behind warrants is to protect the people from the government, not the other way around.


84 posted on 02/17/2016 7:41:51 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: jessduntno

Right. Unbreakable communication already exists online if you use encryption.

The only question here is whether the iPhone should be “breakable”. No law says that it does.


111 posted on 02/17/2016 8:09:52 PM PST by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson