Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno

“to work only on Farook’s phone”

That may be how the warrant is written, but not how the technology works.

The ability to circumvent the 10 entry limit is generally applicable to all phones.

Once they have it, they will be able to use it on whoever they want, whenever they want.

If they were using a PKI system and produced a key, then it’d be applicable to that phone only. But that’s not the case here, nor is it what’s being asked for.


48 posted on 02/17/2016 6:50:21 PM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: fruser1

“That may be how the warrant is written, but not how the technology works.”

The technology needs to be changed to conform to the law, not the other way around.

A warrant has been issued to gather information that may or may not have some very valuable intelligence. Regardless of how the technology is written, it is legal.


59 posted on 02/17/2016 7:03:03 PM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NEW YORK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

“If they were using a PKI system and produced a key, then it’d be applicable to that phone only. But that’s not the case here, nor is it what’s being asked for.”

The warrant is quite clear.


61 posted on 02/17/2016 7:04:59 PM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NEW YORK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson