And bad assumptions, and outright misinterpretations, like saying there was no cell service then quoting that said cell service was irritating but existed.
They DO have equipment. It’s the 21st century. Blood sample kits are standard issue for cops these days (mostly for use in DUI), rape kits, all kinds of evidence handling. And indeed smartphones CAN transmit data. And really the MOST important part which you put the MOST effort into ignoring: the judge was satisfied. Regardless what what info they got and how THEY WERE SATISFIED. So you’re just gonna have to learn to cope.
Did I say there was no service? No, I didn’t. What I posted was the judges comments regarding spotty service. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3397323/posts?page=58#58
To support your opinion you are offering speculation. Speculation that the judge viewed the body via cell phone. Speculation that a blood sample was taken. And so forth.
To support my opinion I offer news reports and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
No offense, but I really don’t care whether you agree with my opinion or not.
You should know the difference between opinion and conjecture. You should know the value of opinion based on fact versus opinion based on conjecture.