Pryor is also an absolute radical pro-lifer who says roe v wade is an abomination.
And he said the law tied his hands about Roy Moore.
We’d need a lawyer to figure it out, but I guarantee you right now that I’d rather have Pryor than Loretta Lynch.
Although I wholeheartedly agree with Pryor's position, isn't this what prevented him from being confirmed and he was then seated via recess appointment?
Thanks for the clarification on the Roy Moore thing btw, I couldn't understand why he would have a strong pro-life position but proceed on a "separation" of church and state case. Makes more sense now.
He didn't have to take the case. He could have recused himself.