Why would they not want us to know whether he had blockages? If it was a heart attack from natural causes the evidence should be right there.
With Breitbart I think they found one artery that had 40% blockage, and that was pretty much it, IIRC. Didn’t have the “widow maker” physiology that most often causes sudden, unexpected death. He hadn’t seen a doctor within the previous year and he had no prescription or street drugs in his system, which doesn’t seem like somebody who was being treated for an urgent heart problem...They didn’t bother to look for a tiny dart-entry hole in his body.
So the autopsy raised questions. As did the acute arsenic poisoning death of one of the technicians at the coroner’s office shortly before the autopsy result came out - which should have been easy to prevent and to find the source of the arsenic but the LAPD lied about the death rather than genuinely investigating it...
Sometimes an autopsy is not wanted because it would raise even more suspicions. If there was a “natural” heart attack, then the physiology of the autopsy would substantiate the pre-existing condition that caused the heart attack. And that would go a long way toward dispelling the suspicions. Any judge would know that. So what is this gal’s problem?
She’s a Dem.