“Trump is my clear early favorite. It could change, but if it does, it won’t because someone is “more conservative.†It will because someone did a better job of letting the light of God through his or her life. I’d dearly like to tell Ted Cruz that showing the face of God is an excellent idea; why not do it?”
Endorsing Planned parenthood ALONE would rule Trump out for me. I will not decide on wh to vote for on the R ticket until the day I vote. Too many surprises. And unlike some, I find myself unable to make such a serious commitment to soemone until the last possible moment. Whoever it is, it will be my best choice as of voting day. It will NOT be someone who gives aid and comfort to my enemies or someone who endorses “the good works of Planned Parenthood.” They do no good works. EVER. They are the creation of some malevolence that I can not describe, but that I know is among us.
You are one of the superficial ones.
The brouhaha over PP is over its non abortion arm.
There are legal considerations here (it was tried with Acorn and that was nixed by a court) and also practical ones (when Acorn finally was busted, it just reorganized under a different name).
I do see a name equity issue here, but we cannot solve that with buzz words about PP. We might be able to solve that with a law which, in effect, would force PP to change the name of its non abortion arm, so it doesn’t give good publicity to its abortion arm (or else it would lose subsidy).
But it seems that reasoned thought is out of style here and knee jerks are in style here.