NO ONE PERSON SHOULD HOLD THIS MUCH POWER OVER 300,000,000 PEOPLE.
NO. ONE !!!
We must reduce the power of the Supreme Court.
One idea: Every state governor nominates a justice. It can be any one citizen (judge) from anywhere in the country. It would be approved by the state legislature. At the same time, a “back up†nominee would be approved so we would not have a long-term vacancy ever on the court.
They would serve 15 yrs and done.
Yeah, it would be political, but it is now.
Judges should have term limits.
Look at Ginsburg for instance. She is sleeping through most of the day and yet she rules on important issues facing the country.l
That's Congress's job...O' Wait...
SCOTUS should not be a beauty contest judged by 50 state governors...
The Senate is to 'advice and consent ' on the POTUS SCOTUS nominee, if the nominee isn't one of the best and brightest they should vote not to confirm...
We don't need 50 political (governors) opinions on top of 100 Senators political decisions....
What a three ring circus that would become...
Before the 17th Amendment, that's more or less how it worked.
“NO ONE PERSON SHOULD HOLD THIS MUCH POWER OVER 300,000,000 PEOPLE. NO ONE!!!”
Mao Tse-tung held absolute power over a billion Chinese. The world will never know how many hundreds of millions of human beings were exterminated by his despotic rule.
Now look at what the death of one man can do to all the rest of us. Frightening.
-— NO ONE PERSON SHOULD HOLD THIS MUCH POWER OVER 300,000,000 PEOPLE.
NO. ONE !!! -—
I hope you’re supporting the Convention of the States. Levin has been talking about this since his book, Men in Black.