Posted on 02/13/2016 5:55:57 PM PST by Blue Turtle
More judges like this no doubt Sharia Law will become the law of the land in the future.
Seems like a flippant response -- you'd better take it seriously.
Guns owned by freedom-loving, law-abiding citizens are a threat to no one but criminals and tyrants.
Which is why a 5 to 4 majority of the Supremes will ignore the constitution, if Obama is allowed to appoint another liberal. The last major challenge was defeated 5-4.
---
Supreme Court affirms fundamental right to bear arms
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134.html
“imo, disgusting. Can we at least pay our respects first ? This is just sad.”
You know, he’s probably not even room temperature yet.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nra-scalia-death-puts-gun-rights-in-jeopardy/article/2583258
.....Sen. Ted Cruz, running strong in the GOP presidential election, said Saturday night that the Second Amendment "stands in the balance."
yeah yer right.
but we got only 4 votes on anything going to the court that has to do with illegal Obama stuff he does this year or illegal Clinton stuff
Not with a name like Barack Hussein Obama ... Oh, never mind.
Well .. sort of. But, even though we are 4 and 4 of justices, if there is a tie .. then the decision goes back down to the lower court - and that decision stands.
And .. in case you didn’t know .. that means that Obama’s DACA would go back to the lower court - AND IT WOULD BE NULL AND VOID. Which means that the mass immigration of young people would be halted.
So, it’s not so bad after all to be minus one judge; at lease on the DACA issue. And, I can see why Obama is “thrilled” to be able to appoint another justice.
My MIL was a graduate!
Sri Srinivasan, just another power hungry leftwing Hindu import, like the POS that the GOPe wanted for California governor in Neel Kashkari.
LOL. How well do you get along with your MIL?
We need to insist on a Christian. For balance, the SCOTUS actually needs a Protestant. A Hindu nominee makes no sense in a Christian nation.
About Cruz being on the judiciary committee....
He voted to CONFIRM Srinivasan.
Srikanth Srinivasan, of Virginia, was nominated to the U.S. Circuit Court Judge for Washington D.C. in May 2013. The tally was 97-0, including votes U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Presidential candidates Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
Cruz, who clerked with Srinivasan at the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, quipped, “I am hopeful that our friendship will not be seen as a strike against you by some.”
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/10/obama-republicans-senate-judges-srinivasan/2068991/#
We must demand that the Senate block anyone OZero nominates. And we should demand that the next president nominates a Protestant.
This is how civil wars start - over stuff like this. I hope the militias are watching this situation closely.
“A Hindu nominee makes no sense in a Christian nation.”
It does if your goal is to fundamentally alter the United States and diminish its native culture.
Right. And the Republicans winning all those Senate races has consequences.
Ginsberg will go next. Like it or not, the Pres has the right to name Justices, and the Reps canât say no just because.
Why not?
I'd prefer they stick with the "no, we're going to leave this up to the next President." But if not, the next best move is simply to slow down the process. Give him hearings, but delay and don't schedule a vote until after the election.
If a Democrat wins, then might as well confirm the guy because he has a chance of being less left-wing that someone else. But if a Republican wins, bury the nomination and wait for a Republican nominee.
Waiting for the election is almost a best-case scenario.
He was approved 97 to 0 to a D.C. Appeals Court Judgeship, a Court considered one of the most important and Conservative in the Nation. There was not one NO Vote against him.
If Nominated to the SCOTUS, what can they use against him?
He will get the Wise Latina and the other Lesbian treatment and will be Appointed faster than Obama high fived his Golf Caddy when he found out Scalia passed away.
Supremes can rule whatever they want. In regards to illegal edicts... We won’t comply. Obambicare, etc. Constitution and God given rights aren’t up for negotiation. So the NRA can whine with the other chorus about “rights in jeopardy” when in fact that’s a personal decision on whether or not to obey. Oh it’s quite serious indeed when personal consequences result for tyrants and scumbags who violate their oaths :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.