Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Republicans really block Obama’s Supreme Court nomination for a year? Probably.
Washington Post ^ | February 13, 2016 | Amber Phillips

Posted on 02/13/2016 5:02:31 PM PST by SMGFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Ladysforest

It is pure EVIL!

But I expected nothing less.


21 posted on 02/13/2016 5:17:58 PM PST by blondiegoodbadugly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

McConnell has said many things that had no relation to what he then did. His words and deeds have no correlation except in the negative in which there is a high correlation.


22 posted on 02/13/2016 5:18:29 PM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Has Grassley made that statement already?


23 posted on 02/13/2016 5:19:09 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

“They damn sure better ..This is horrible”...

My words EXACTLY.


24 posted on 02/13/2016 5:19:14 PM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Senator Cruz should immediately announce that he will nominate JANICE ROGERS BROWN to the Supreme Court immediately after he is inaugurated.


25 posted on 02/13/2016 5:19:15 PM PST by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

They could.
Will they, no.
Graham, McConnell, McCain, the entire RINO wing will clamor to be “inclusive” and “bipartisan”.


26 posted on 02/13/2016 5:19:40 PM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

There is no way Obama can be allowed to make a third appointment to the Supreme Court.

The Republic can survive another 342 days until he is out of office.

There is no specified number of Supreme Court members.

Eight is plenty for now.


27 posted on 02/13/2016 5:20:09 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
Has Grassley made that statement already?

Nevermind, found it ... Grassley joins call to delay Supreme Court nomination

28 posted on 02/13/2016 5:20:42 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

“McConnel is being quoted as saying the Senate will not accept any Obama appointment to the court, that the next President will get to pick.”

OH NO! If McConnel said that, we can be sure he is on his knees begging to kiss Obama’s butt as soon as he submits a name. McConnel is Quisling’s Quisling.


29 posted on 02/13/2016 5:21:10 PM PST by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

I just heard the bad news. Scalia was a giant of American jurisprudence.

I’m not exaggerating at all with what follows ... if the establishment GOP once again bends over for the minority and allows another Sotomeyer or Kagan political hack through the doors, it will not be the end of the GOP.
It will be the beginning of the end of the country we can barely remember as soon as they decide to hear a 2nd amendment case.
Now is the time to mourn a great Supreme Court justice.
But you know the `rats have already begun scheming and working.

No more Supreme Court Justices from that little turd!


30 posted on 02/13/2016 5:21:58 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Don’t forget that idiot, Hatch of Utah.

He’ll be moaning that of course the President has a right to select the nominee and get the nominee of his choosing approved.

He is such a tool.


31 posted on 02/13/2016 5:22:33 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Of course the republicans can block it. Will they is the question.


32 posted on 02/13/2016 5:22:59 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I’m no fan of McConnell, but it could be way worse ..Dirty Harry and the Dims could be in control of the Senate .. Thank God they are not


33 posted on 02/13/2016 5:23:34 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (Will Cruz endorse Trump or Jeb? That is the question... Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

But will they? I don’t expect they will.


34 posted on 02/13/2016 5:23:48 PM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

If the senate and McConnell cave to odumbo this time, this country should and just may cause such an uprising that it will be heard around the world, eve to the point of an all out rebellion, its long past due anyway.


35 posted on 02/13/2016 5:25:16 PM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

See my post 33 ..it could be way worse right now


36 posted on 02/13/2016 5:27:38 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (Will Cruz endorse Trump or Jeb? That is the question... Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

No doubt a Dem Senate would block it if the President was Republican. This is a no brainer. Block it


37 posted on 02/13/2016 5:28:10 PM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Grassley joins call to delay Supreme Court nomination
"The fact of the matter is that it's been standard practice over the last 80 years to not confirm Supreme Court nominees during a presidential election year," Grassley said. "Given the huge divide in the country, and the fact that this President, above all others, has made no bones about his goal to use the courts to circumvent Congress and push through his own agenda, it only makes sense that we defer to the American people who will elect a new president to select the next Supreme Court Justice."

38 posted on 02/13/2016 5:28:46 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blondiegoodbadugly

Eric Holder.


39 posted on 02/13/2016 5:29:26 PM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

They aren’t called “Republican’ts” for nothing.

Come on guys. You dont want them to get called bad names in the press, do you?

Backing down in 5...4...3...2...1


40 posted on 02/13/2016 5:29:40 PM PST by nitzy (I don't vote for Republican'ts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson