Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GrouchoTex

So at best what you are telling me is that Ted was just one more guy willing to go along to get along for personal gain.

As a Conservative, I would not have been able to stifle my own support for state’s rights and the objections to illegal immigrants being rewarded with amnesty, the Bush plan when Ted worked for him.

In 1999 I was hoping for a president that would finally address illegal immigration and get tough, and Ted was just looking for a paycheck from an enemy of our nation.

This is the guy we are led to believe was one of us? Really?

Ted was part of the problem, not the solution.


237 posted on 02/14/2016 6:46:39 AM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

POTUS is still POTUS Bush comes out 5 years earlier against 187, and
Cruz also suggest someone other than Roberts, but got shot down. Yes, he supported Roberts, but not his first choice. Heck we all had high hopes for Roberts.
Cruz did leave in 2003 and didn’t stick around until 2008.
Medellin v Texas, which Cruz argues against the Bush position in front of SCOTUS, is some thing you should check out.
Not that it will change your mind, to pick Cruz as POTUS, but it is a good barometer as to Cruz’s legal mindset.
No matter who you support, I think all of us would agree that Cruz nailed this in a way we could all be happy with.


238 posted on 02/14/2016 1:30:37 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson