[FourtySeven]

Me: “but [Trump] ALSO said the “government will pay”. Again that’s just a fact.”

You: “This isn’t rocket science when context is applied.

Trump - ‘’What I’d like to see is a private system without the artificial lines around every state.’”

That’s not the context at all! Talk about “lying”, look at the video posted (inadvertently) by Ann, the one UNDER the one she talks about. On that video you see Trump on CBS say “the government will pay” when asked “who will pay (for all those who can’t pay for private insurance)”. Here: http://m.therightscoop.com/watch-ted-cruz-highlights-trumps-very-liberal-record-on-the-kelly-file/

He mentions something about “we will save so much money on the other end” so that somehow justifies his “government will pay”’comment. There’s nothing about what you posted. What you posted is from another source another time. Which is again, TYPICAL of Trump. One time says one thing, one time says another.

Just admit it! You only support him for how he’s talked about illegal immigration. Admit it! What’s the problem? Don’t like wallowing in such shallow simplicity? Your fellow Trump fans on this thread don’t seem to have such compunctions.

[dynoman]

I don’t understand the point you are trying to make.

[Reagan Disciple]

There would be a huge reduction in contentious postings if the Trump supporters would just say outloud he's not a Conservative and they support him as such.

That's freewill. That's personal choice that we can all respect.

Then the playing field would be set.

[dynoman]

You ignored this part of my reply, it’s the context the “government will pay” part;

“And he wants the 25% the rest of us are paying for now to still be covered even if the government pays for it. The government (the rest of us) pays for most of them now through welfare.

Now do you advocate that 25% pay for their own HC? If yes, how do you propose to make them pay for it?? Do you have any workable solutions??”