Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2016 1:59:12 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: drewh

Yeppers. Every Mexican in this country sends money back to Mexico. Every one of them!


2 posted on 02/10/2016 2:02:50 PM PST by Catsrus (I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

A billion here, a billion or two there...

Pretty soon it adds up to something real (like a wall.)


3 posted on 02/10/2016 2:05:04 PM PST by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Here is another case where they all scream, “How can he say that!” and then come around to “He’s right!”


4 posted on 02/10/2016 2:05:32 PM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Drug lords would start a money delivery service and cut out WU.


5 posted on 02/10/2016 2:07:09 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

That’s just the remittances.

How about the profits on drug running? Which, incidentally, the Mexican government has always shared.


6 posted on 02/10/2016 2:07:10 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

This thought has crossed my mind many times.

We absolutely can make them pay for the wall.

Taxing 25 billion a year that is sent back to Mexico would be easy pickings.

Americans are largely unaware of the vast global economy they maintain via remittances. Roughly a quarter of a trillion dollars is sent in to the global economy every year— this is what we are directly aware of.

For many nations, including Mexico, remittances from the US are the number one economic input.

This is why it is rather absurd to pretend America is not exceptional. We fund a huge number of global economies.

We can demand cooperation on this vast enterprise or we can tax it or even shut it down. We easily have power over remittances.


7 posted on 02/10/2016 2:07:23 PM PST by lonestar67 (I remember when unemployment was 4.7 percent / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Where there’s a “will”, there’s a “way” ..... the problem is that there has been no political will to anything about an issue that is hurting American citizens. Politics & power, not what is best for America, has been the rule for a long, long time now .... and the establishment types wonder why we’re mad.


8 posted on 02/10/2016 2:08:56 PM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
if we could figure out to do it with great speed, we probably could bankrupt a couple of countries.

Change the color of the paper money.

9 posted on 02/10/2016 2:09:02 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Likely that the drug industry is Mexico’s largest money maker. Isn’t Mexico now the largest illegal drug economy in the world? If it weren’t for the drug trade Mexico would be a dying country with an astounding negative growth rate.


10 posted on 02/10/2016 2:09:51 PM PST by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I never doubted for one millisecond that this was possible. Like everything in service of the public weal, all that is needed? Political will.


11 posted on 02/10/2016 2:10:11 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Duh.


13 posted on 02/10/2016 2:10:29 PM PST by Williams (Dear God, please save us from the Democrats. And the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

What I’ve been saying for months. A 50% surcharge on remittances to Mexico - much more constitutional than the income tax, and would help to depress the incentives for them to come here in the first place.


14 posted on 02/10/2016 2:10:52 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Posted about 15 stories down. Search before you post.


15 posted on 02/10/2016 2:11:10 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

16 posted on 02/10/2016 2:11:48 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Just a threat of tariffs on Mexico manufactured goods flowing tax free in US, would make Mexico cough up money instantly to build the wall.

Trump is right again!


17 posted on 02/10/2016 2:11:51 PM PST by entropy12 (Go Gilmore! You da man!! (no one is pulling for this poor guy on FR, So I have to do it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

i guess perot was dead right about the “giant sucking sound.”


21 posted on 02/10/2016 2:13:36 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

We could build a pretty nice fence for $28 Billion.


22 posted on 02/10/2016 2:14:03 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

That’s $25 billion per year not being spent here in the States. Essentially it is removed from our economy.


25 posted on 02/10/2016 2:18:10 PM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

It would be interesting to know whether money transfers are treated as taxable or not under NAFTA, or not addressed at all. My guess would be the latter but I’m not sure. If a tax was applied to international transfers it probably couldn’t be specifically directed at Western Union and would likely have to cover any and all transfers to any and all countries. Other countries might see the idea as a new cash cow and do the same, in reciprocity / retaliation against the American tax. Would a court possibly consider such a tax a tariff on exports (something explicitly forbidden in the Constitution). I’m not at all opposed to the idea, just thinking about the downstream implications. I know some people think Trump would be able to do a lot of things with a wave of his hand or with a pen stroke on an executive order. But even a president has to work within the system of government we have. Otherwise we’d just be replacing a wannabe dictator with a real one.


28 posted on 02/10/2016 2:26:20 PM PST by katana (Just my opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh; Tennessee Nana; Grampa Dave; AuntB; RitaOK; ExTexasRedhead; RoosterRedux; ...
You can bet your combo plate that the federales are getting a nice cut of those remittances......which is why Mexico/s Calderone piped up about Donald/s plan to make Mexico pay for it.

NICE COMEBACK DONALD: when Calerone said Mexico was not paying for no wall.....Donald said on broadcast tv The wall just got higher.

LMAO.

==============================================

L/E should check it out....if Western Union is wire-transferring monies obtained illegally...maybe from using multiple identities to get US government checks....W/U could be charged w/ wire fraud and money laundering.

31 posted on 02/10/2016 2:28:16 PM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson