[GodGunsGuts]

If you would like to be added to the
TED CRUZ 2016 PING LIST drop me a FReepmail.

[digger48]

It seems these totals are all over the place.

I’ve seen and heard probably 8 different accounts and every single one has different numbers

Doesn’t take away from the fact that jeb has blown $50 million so far in two states and only got a T-shirt

[MNJohnnie]

Never thought I would say this.

Thank you John Kaisch for jamming up the Establishment Fast lane with your clown car campaign.

[dynoman]

I love hop blatantly myopic some of this analysis is. In Iowa Trump spent 10% of Cruz for one less delegate. In other words, Cruz spent 3 million more than Trump and got one delegate more than Trump.

There is no doubt about who is the most efficient when it comes to votes per $ spent. It’s NOT Cruz.

[blackdog]

"Donald Trump's massive and massively consequential New Hampshire victory cost the billionaire businessman a mere $40 per vote, according to a study done by Morning Consult. To come in a distant fourth place, Jeb Bush spent a mind-boggling $1200 per vote."

A micro case study on the economic efficiencies of how politicians got us where we are with the national spending wreck.

[Uncle Miltie]

"right now this is a Trump-Cruz race - the GOP Establishment's worst nightmare - and Revolution is in the air"

Hoooahhhhh!!!!

Blood in the waters.

[Solson]

A better analysis would be to combine the price-per-vote for all candidates between Iowa and New Hampshire. Then, it’s easy to see who is winning that race.

[uncitizen]

There’s a good chance that Rubio taking third place in Iowa was bogus; created out of whole cloth by the Microsoft software and other cheating...The LSM/Establishment think that when people hear someone is winning they’ll jump on the bandwagon. But it didn’t happen in this case.