There is something extremely revolting about that wording.
Using "Hillary" and "her sex" in the same sentence, page, paragraph or article is an open abuse of the 1st amendment.
Posted on 02/07/2016 3:34:18 AM PST by Libloather
Hillary Clinton on Thursday said a woman cannot be considered part of the Establishment.
Clinton offered the claim during a Democratic presidential debate with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders in Durham, New Hampshire. Sanders said Clinton "has the entire Establishment or almost the entire Establishment behind her. That's a fact."
But Hillary said her sex makes that impossible.
"Well, look, I've got to just jump in here because, honestly, Senator Sanders is the only person who I think would characterize me, a woman running to be the first woman president, as exemplifying the Establishment. And I've got to tell you that it is really quite amusing to me."
(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...
Ewww. Is there anything else women can't do? Bruce Jenner may need to chime in here...
And you my dear are not a women
And, blacks can’t be racists, queers can’t be sexual bigots, liberals can’t be atheists because they ‘feel’, blah, blah, blah........
In the liberal world only white conservative can be considered “bad”.
This is like minorities can not be racist because they do not have “the power”.
So woman can not be part of the establishment.
Being equal means you can be judged by your action, not your color or your sex.
It is time that the left begins being judged by their own standards.
..or I should have said, by the standards they use to judge conservatives.
Can women be incarcerated?
Hillary and Lady Macbeth were both “establishment”
Should be White Heterosexual Conservative Male.
Is that like saying blacks can't be racist?
Actually, after some reflection, I think “conservative” can stand alone.
To a liberal, if a minority is conservative they stop being a minority and they become “white” in their eyes.
If a woman is a conservative, she is no longer a “woman” in their eyes which is how they can say they are defending women while at the same time viciously attacking a conservative woman.
Fine. Everyone say they ‘identify’ as a woman. Then the establishment is gone.
Hitlery is so full of it.
The bold face lies this woman will tell with a straight face.
Anita Broderick and other women who were thrown under the bus by Hillary because they were in the way of Hillary’s ambitions weren’t ‘establishment’. Hillary jets around in private planes, makes millions upon millions in speaking fees alone (including over $600,000 for three talks to Goldman Sachs), rubs elbows with the richest of the rich, and is able to get away from prosecution for actions that would land most people in jail, but she isn’t ‘establishment’? She’s despicable, on a good day.
You have a point. I remember a news clip in which bunch of college feminist coeds were dishing out their venom on men. A white girl was dishing out on white male for being an “oppressor.” An Asian girl chimed in and said that an Asian male are also an oppressor. The reason? Some Asians are successful and in a position of power and money. “Success” is oppressive. If Asians are all miserably poor, Asian males won’t be labeled as oppressors even if they beat up women everyday.
Her and her boss
$100,000,000.00+ wealth gained from political ties makes you the establishment.
Poor Poor Hillary. As an ex-Senator, ex-Sec of State, ex-lawyer, ex-First Lady she is still held back by the evil patriarchy. /S
Oh God, she’s pulling the sex card already. Well I guess that’s all she has to run on. “Vote for me because I have a vagina”
BACKSTORY As a tolerant and compassionate progressive New York senator w/ large blocs of black votes, Hillary Clinton championed a US law that would have cracked down on the illicit mineral trade that subjected blacks to white oppression in the dirt-poor African state....the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Fast-forward to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The head of a Canadian company with an enormous interest in the Congo's mining and oil sector, Lukas Lundin of Lundin Mining, announced a $100 million donation to the Clinton Foundation on the heels of Hillary/'s first presidential campaign.
After the Congolese government attempted to regain control of its own mines, the State Department intervened on behalf of Lundin Mining and another mining company, Freeport Mines, also a Clinton foundation donor.
A round of talks in 2010, thought to be aided by the Clinton State Department, concluded with the pair of well-connected companies retaining their stakes in the mines and with the Congolese government being shut out of its own resources. (hat tip Schweizer book---Clinton Cash)
MORAL OF THE STORY When Hillary smells money, she will throw black constituents under the bus in order to to suck-up to Clnton Foundation donors....particularly those w/ financial stakes in the mineral industry.
There is something extremely revolting about that wording.
Using "Hillary" and "her sex" in the same sentence, page, paragraph or article is an open abuse of the 1st amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.