We vill need the individual states to assert local control, not Washington.
The world would not continue business as usual if the USA were taken out. We would need a national single point of contact for the worldwide condemnation that follows. Remember, the United Nations is in New York City and would also be affected. Trump could easily take over and coordinate worldwide reaction while the states manage the local crisis. In fact, Trump might even stay in NYC to better work with the UN. Who Knows?
I just don't think the Canada, UK, France, Germany, Australia, and others would ignore what happens here and proved as if nothing happened.
-PJ
Canada would likely be in the same boat as us.
How would the states provide protection, food, water, shelter, and medicine for people? Without that all you’ve got is chaos.
Obama has alienated every ally we’ve got - and they are all being overrun by Islamist orcs too; what are they doing to fight back? You think they would stop thinking about controlling their own issues - which, as you say, would be hit by a US economic collapse too, in addition to the Islamist invasion currently wreaking havoc - and send an invading force to the US to fight Obama’s military and try to bring order to the entire USA?
Would your family have food, water, shelter, and protection to last you several years in such a scenario?
My concern is to preserve life. If there would be a way to prevent these kinds of attacks, that would be the first thing to do, before worrying too much about whether the next POTUS is Trump, Cruz, Rubio, or whoever. The way this needs to work is for the candidates to focus on the risks and the need to protect the country. FORCE Congress to do something to prevent these attacks. As the candidates focus on the real dangers rather than on attacking each other, the voters can see who is most able to do what is needed.