Not much substance? Please explain how his economic answers were not substance when he discussed Chinese devaluation and bad deals for decades.
He explained the economic answers far batter than the rest and understands markets better than anyone in that room.
But Cruz is a lawyer and has argued in front of the SUPREME COURT!!!! Doesn't that make him more accomplished?
Well, yes, the Chinese answers did have some substance. Trump is familiar with that. I would give him a B on those answers but he speaking style detracts from his actual good answers.
Actually, I thought Christie was better on the economic aspect of taxing business.