Notwithstanding, a gun falls under the definition of an ‘Arm’, in a much as a ‘firearm’ or taser (each having their own sub-definition).
No offense to you specifically, but I loathe the attempt at parsing the Left.
SCOTUS can attempt to parse ‘gun’, but must fall under the general term, for which the definitive is absolute: “shall NOT be infringed.”.
A single page to the court, VERY few lines:
- The 2nd re-arms the INALIENABLE Right of We the People
- That for which has no specific authority (IE: infringe), all laws are null/void.
Case. Closed. Let the chips fall where they may. It would come as a surprise if they ruled against? What would that accomplish but being driven underground and/or a 2nd Revolution (LONG past time, IMO)?
Oh don’t ever doubt, I FIRMLY believe that this is THE issue that the second Civil War could originate.
I am happy that things seem to be moving in the right direction, for a change.
I can imagine the turmoil Obama must be feeling as his ‘legacy’ of gun control and health care seem to be falling apart.
I am hopeful the tide has turned.