No proof? Check this out. A federal court ruled that he did know.
How do you defend that?
That's right, no proof. Actually read the article. The case was initially tossed out. The liability finding was that he should have known...
The appeals court found that if the Trump parties had not known of the Polish workers, “they should have known.â€
This is known as a legal 'deep pockets' finding. Go after the one with the money. I am sure Trump has learned from this, given he fired the person who should have known. What else you got?
I’m in highrise construction.
Good luck finding a demo contractor that doesn’t use illegals.
They’ll all have paperwork in the files but people use other/fake IDs all the time.
If you were to actually recheck every single worker every time they come/go on site, nothing would ever get built