That's right, no proof. Actually read the article. The case was initially tossed out. The liability finding was that he should have known...
The appeals court found that if the Trump parties had not known of the Polish workers, “they should have known.â€
This is known as a legal 'deep pockets' finding. Go after the one with the money. I am sure Trump has learned from this, given he fired the person who should have known. What else you got?
The local US District Court Judge may have tossed the case, but the Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it.
The fact remains that on appeal, the Court ruled against Trump, that Trump or one of his minions used a false name in order to threaten an attorney, that a direct employee of Trump was regularly on the job site, that Trump knew or shold have known what was going on, That Trump claimed he had no duty to pay the illegal workers, and Trump settled the matter with the employees and had the settlement sealed so it would not be public.
So you still think Trump did nothing wrong?