Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

Well the polls had him winning Iowa also.

But he didn’t.

He may win N.H. but his glow is fading.


85 posted on 02/04/2016 10:11:45 PM PST by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: altura

Not correct. Trump was polling lower in Iowa than all other 49 states for 6 months. He was never in first place in Iowa polls until the very last week before caucus. Cheating UNtrusTED spread falls rumors about Dr. Carson quitting the race. That is the tactic liberal democrats use. Without cheating, UNtrusTED loses Iowa caucus, because only 3 votes stolen from Dr Carson were enough for UNtrusted to win.

I do not understand how Cruz supporters can tolerate a cheater.


92 posted on 02/04/2016 10:16:53 PM PST by entropy12 (Cruz could double as a wind sock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: altura

Eh, the last Des Moines Register poll a few days B4 the Caucus showed Trump pulling ahead by, what, 5 points? I do not recall the margin of error. (This poll has very often been wrong.)

Then, I remember a couple polls posted on FR the day before the Caucus (one might have even been the same day.) They showed essentially a tie. Also, Cruz switched his last ads to against Rubio. With little other data to go on, and knowing Cruz was putting in a huge effort / ground game, I figured Ted had the advantage / late momentum vs. Trump. I cannot speak for anyone else’s analysis.


140 posted on 02/04/2016 11:52:49 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson