Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco artist is evicted from his rent control apartment after 34 years
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | February 4, 2016 | Jim Edwards

Posted on 02/04/2016 6:53:38 PM PST by artichokegrower

If you're interested in whether rent control makes rent prices go down — and plenty of people think it actually makes them go up — then stop what you're doing and watch this video on San Francisco's real-estate war, by my colleague Andrew Stern.

The video features a heartbreaking interview with artist David Brenkus, who has lived in a rent-controlled apartment on Walter Street for 34 years.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; crymeariver; demagogicparty; evicted; eviction; liberalhypocrisy; realestate; rentcontrol; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: artichokegrower

My last apartment in San Francisco sold for over $1,000,000.

This guy is a moron.


21 posted on 02/04/2016 7:40:30 PM PST by Read Write Repeat (Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
It's a perfect illustration of the way rent control can hurt the poor and benefit the rich, even though it is intended to do the opposite how bureaucrats have sufficient hubris to think they can allocate resources better than a free market.

There...fixed. It always amazes me that, while markets make billions of decisions each second, some idiot thinks he can do it better.

22 posted on 02/04/2016 7:45:26 PM PST by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Read Write Repeat

I got the feeling that he felt that he was entitled to live here for $735.00 forever. On one hand I do feel sorry for him the other you can only live off someone’s hard work for so long. The gig is up. Go to Santa Fe, nice artist colony there.


23 posted on 02/04/2016 7:48:57 PM PST by Kozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Sorry pal, you used up all the karma you were owed. Now you have to go out and actually work.


24 posted on 02/04/2016 7:48:59 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower


25 posted on 02/04/2016 7:51:22 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Brenkus is an experimental photographer whose home doubles as his studio and gallery.


26 posted on 02/04/2016 7:52:30 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Artist David Brenkus has lived on the top floor of a three-story building in Duboce Triangle for the past 34 years. [...] He pays $735 a month for the two-bedroom unit.

The Harshawat family purchased the building in 2013 - the ground floor unit for the grandparents, middle floor for [Emma Acker and her husband Ish] and the top floor for brother Kaveet.

Only Kaveet can’t move in because Brenkus refuses to move out, even after the family offered him an $80,000 buyout.

“I think our lawyer said it’s the most generous offer he’s seen in 25 years,” Ish said.

In February, they filed for an Ellis Act eviction, which allows landlords to evict tenants if a family member plans to occupy the unit.


27 posted on 02/04/2016 7:54:21 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

28 posted on 02/04/2016 7:55:45 PM PST by Read Write Repeat (Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

He’s paying $365 a month for a two-bedroom apartment in the pleasant, tree-lined Duboce Triangle neighborhood, where two-bedroom units are advertised for $5,550. The new owners have offered him $80,000 to vacate (plus $50,000 for his roommate), but he’s turned it down. He’s hinting he’d listen to a higher offer.

And now he’s enlisted the help of the firebrand advocacy group Eviction Free San Francisco, whose battle cry is: “Whose homes? Our homes! No more speculation, no more evictions.”


29 posted on 02/04/2016 7:57:38 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

So maybe it is time for a reality check. Asked how he made a living, Brenkus didn’t have a straight answer. He does a little carpentry and odd jobs. He admits he hasn’t sold any photographs for some time.

“The idea that this guy is some sort of an artist?” Zachs said. “Try to find him on the Internet. I don’t see him as someone adding to the artistic fiber of the city.”

Frankly, Brenkus’ greatest asset was a sweetheart rent-controlled apartment. He had a great run with it for 34 years, but now the numbers don’t add up.

“As far as I can tell, he doesn’t work,” Zachs said. “He can’t afford to live here. And you don’t have a right to be here just because you came here 34 years ago.”

http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nevius/article/S-F-rent-wars-When-the-tenant-is-the-bully-6582895.php


30 posted on 02/04/2016 8:01:41 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Rent control benefits rich people and hurts the poor.
Manhattan is PACKED with sneaky old money voting “left...”
As long as they NEVER HAVE TO LIVE where the “dirty people” live...
(For four times the rent!)
“It’s been in our family for ages,” says the lefty Barnard girl who lives on Daddy’s money.
“One day if I really work hard I can live in Manhattan,” says the sucker who knows that all that lies between her and her dreams is LEFT WING ELITE RENT CONTROL.


31 posted on 02/04/2016 10:02:24 PM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Bingo. Thanks, Bedford.


32 posted on 02/04/2016 10:03:30 PM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
He could have always pulled a "Pacific Heights"....


33 posted on 02/04/2016 10:05:03 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I had a gibsmedat co-worker who complained that her mother couldn’t retire on her social security; when I asked what work her mother had done, she replied that she had watched children for cash (a career of choice in the ghetto). She mentioned her mother had to go back to work; when I asked what she was now doing...she went back to watching children for cash.

Parasites; they will never contribute anything, but take take take. The co-worker is trying get permanent disability; she was one of those forced off welfare when her children “aged out” of the freebies...


34 posted on 02/05/2016 3:48:09 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

As a father and primary breadwinner, a big risk with working under the table is being injured on the job (never mind the lack of SS contributions you mention, or the lack of unemployment insurance). Here in NJ the underground economy is thriving with the illegals working under the table; Americans simply aren’t offered jobs in some sectors. The owners that use the braceros defend it by saying they can’t compete without them; they’d be underbid on any work by competitors that use them.


35 posted on 02/05/2016 3:52:16 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

He demonstrates the morals and ethos of a worthless socialist. He is the perfect example of the Ant and the Grasshopper. He is the grasshopper.

Like uber liberals he does not understand that the property is private and owned by someone else, who will eventually sell it for various reasons at their discretion. He has absolutely no right to the property at all yet thinks the owner owes him something, or worse yet, he has grandfathered his rights to the property by simply living there.

KICK HIS ASS OUT! He is one of the millions of reasons our country has gone down the toilet in the name of collective socialism.

You are right, he can’t come to grips that he has been a lazy, sorry artist if over all of these years he has not amassed enough money to buy a house, apartment or condo.


36 posted on 02/05/2016 4:38:25 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bfl


37 posted on 02/05/2016 7:00:09 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The new owners have offered him $80,000 to vacate (plus $50,000 for his roommate), but he's turned it down. He's hinting he'd listen to a higher offer.

And now he's enlisted the help of the firebrand advocacy group Eviction Free San Francisco, whose battle cry is: "Whose homes? Our homes! No more speculation, no more evictions."

It would not be at all surprising if tenants like that had "accidents". Like in the old days.

38 posted on 02/05/2016 10:30:19 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

He can move to a small town.

But then few people want to live in the middle of nowhere.

San Francisco is super expensive.


39 posted on 02/05/2016 1:48:58 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

My brother-in-law* employs about 20% of Montevideo, illegally of course, for his contractor business. Recently one of them supposedly was injured. The illegal knew immediately to lawyer up and is suing him and now my BIL has some ‘splainin’ to do with a couple state agencies.

*I haven’t talked to him or my sister (a public school teacher) in years. I was told this happened by a relative who still lives in the same city that they do.

And you can probably guess which political party they both worship.


40 posted on 02/06/2016 7:20:19 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson