Posted on 02/04/2016 4:36:57 PM PST by Osage Orange
Federal corruption case snares leaders of South Texas city
Published: February 4, 2016
DALLAS (AP) — Almost every top official in a remote South Texas city was arrested Thursday under a detailed federal indictment that accuses them of taking bribes from contractors and sending city workers to help an illegal gambling operator nicknamed "Mr. T."
Crystal City's mayor, city manager, mayor pro tempore, one of three current councilmen and a former councilman were all arrested under an indictment obtained by the U.S. attorney's office in San Antonio, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney said.
A second councilman is already charged in a separate case with smuggling Mexican immigrants. That leaves just one councilman not facing federal charges in Crystal City, a town of about 7,100 people about 50 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border.
Once billed as the "Spinach Capital of the World," Crystal City's logo features a cartoon of Popeye, and a spinach festival with a cook-off and a beauty pageant draws tens of thousands of people each year. But in recent months, the town has been in the news for turmoil at City Hall and allegations of misuse of public money.
"What happened is nothing to celebrate. It's something sad that happened to us," said the remaining councilman, Joel Barajas, on Thursday. "By all means, we need to move forward."
The indictment accuses the town's leadership of using their positions "to enrich themselves by soliciting and accepting payments and other things of value." Also charged was Ngoc Tri Nguyen, alleged to be an operator of illegal gambling rooms, who was nicknamed "Mr. T."
Crystal City Mayor Ricardo Lopez took $6,000 from Nguyen to buy a vehicle, the indictment alleges. In return, he allegedly waived some taxes for Nguyen and had employees close competing casinos that violate state law but exist informally throughout South Texas. Lopez allegedly told city employees inspecting Nguyen's property to "make it easy."
City Manager William James Jonas and Mayor Pro Tempore Rogelio Mata are accused of giving a contractor a $12,000 payment "in exchange for payments and other things of value."
And Lopez, Rogelio Mata, current councilman Roel Mata and former councilman Gilbert Urrabazo are accused of voting to keep Jonas as city attorney and city manager at a salary reported by local media to exceed $200,000. In exchange, Jonas provided payments and other illegal benefits to the four leaders, the indictment alleges.
None of the six men had attorneys listed in federal court records, and several messages left at City Hall were not returned.
When Barajas, who was elected to the council last year, tried to have Jonas' contract suspended last month, the rest of the council boycotted the meeting so it couldn't go forward.
Barajas said then that the city had nearly $2 million in unpaid bills and was facing bankruptcy.
Separately, Crystal City Councilman Marco Rodriguez was accused last month of smuggling three Mexican immigrants in the back of a pickup truck.
Residents interviewed Thursday said the arrests are painful but necessary.
"Crystal City is a good town," said 67-year-old Maria Sanchez Rivera, a lifelong resident. "If you do wrong, you have to face your consequences. We've got laws for everything and we've got to abide by what the law says."
Richard Durbin Jr., the U.S. attorney for San Antonio, said he hoped the indictment would help restore public confidence in local government, but that his office could only go so far. None of the officials will immediately lose their positions.
"What we can do is that first step," Durbin said in an interview. "In the end, it falls back on the citizens to make the next decision on who they put in those offices, because that's how the system works."
¡POR SUPUESTO!
Mexican government = corruption from the bottom up
What else is new?
Are saying there is bias in this report?
Point it out to me....Maybe I missed something.
Again?
Crystal City & Carrizo Springs have stuff like this going on every decade or so. They’re probably just the ones we hear about.
San Antonio has a few, too. We’re about due for another one. Unless everybody’s gotten so used to it, they barely notice anymore.
I also mentioned “incompetence” which is a form of “bias by omission”.
Nowhere in the article is/are the Party affiliations mentioned.
The standard for writing about politicians is to identify them by position (i.e. Congressman, City Councilwoman, Mayor, etc) and Party affiliation (often with the state attached to it) such as (D-Cal.), (R-Ill), (Ind. - Pa), (D-NYC), etc.
I’m an Old School journalist. My editors told me to be “concise, accurate, and document everything”. “Everything” includes political identities.
“Elect Mexican politicians and you get Mexican government.”
You saved me the typing! My guess is that all of the Texas counties bordering the Rio Grande are in similar circumstances. Then, it’s the same over in Arizona.
”Almost every top official in a remote South Texas city was arrested Thursday under a detailed federal [emphasis added] indictment that accuses them of taking bribes from contractors and sending city workers to help an illegal gambling operator nicknamed ”Mr. T.””
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument
There is not enough information given in referenced article to be sure about the following possible constitutional problem.
Since this is not a voting rights issue, if the federal indictments are not based on federal laws reasonably based on one of the clauses in Congresss constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, regulating INTRAstate gambling not one of those powers, then the mixed-up feds have no constitutional authority to hand indictments to anybody for the reasons indicated imo.
What am I overlooking?
Yes, you are of course correct.
If it would have been a pubbie town...it would be noted.
All democrats, voted in office by illegal aliens.
How is this any different than what happened with the Clinton Foundation?
I know, rhetorical question.
Don’t know the answer..........
Nowhere in the article is/are the Party affiliations mentioned.
The skunks we smell here is without question.....Democrats!
The key difference between a skunk and a Democrat is that a skunk has a WHITE STRIPE down its back. A Democrat has a YELLOW STRIPE down its back.
Skunks fight. Democrats surrender. Believe me, I’ve tangled with both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.