Posted on 02/04/2016 1:03:54 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans
Two days ago Breitbart's Milo Yiannopoulos and Allum Bokhari (the latter's twitter page linked up above) began teasing an "Explosive" Cruz scandal that was supposed to post imminently on Breitbart.com.
According to Allum Bokhari, it would reveal the 'true face' of Ted Cruz and would be "much worse" than the Ben Carson-fraud fiasco currently ongoing. When asked if it would destroy the Cruz campaign, Allum replied he "couldn't say for sure." When asked about the initial delay, he replied that Breitbart is being very careful with the information due to its seriousness, but that the "wait was worth it."
At first I thought maybe Allum and Milo were simply trolling their readership due to the silence for more than 24 hours, but it appears the article really is coming and is indeed quite serious. According to Allum the article was held up in editorial, and now updates his readers with the following:
Allum Bokhari â€@LibertarianBlue 2h Been told it's a few more days before we can drop the new Cruz goss. Nothing I can do :(
@6ae025af2132401 can't come out for a few days. My hands are tied, and not in the fun way. :(
Allum has been posting 1 or 2 stories a day with no such similar delays, so it appears Breitbart is holding onto the story till after the vote in New Hampshire, probably to avoid accusations of trying to influence the election.
Other than the tweets about it being an "explosive" scandal, Milo and Allum have been entirely mum on the contents of the story, and haven't responded to multiple questions regarding whether Breitbart editors like Ben Shapiro may be trying to suppress it. Nevertheless, there is no indication the story will not be breaking at this point.
I find you to be deceptive and dishonorable, have you ever publicly prayed?
I find you to be self-deceptive and utterly stupid.
“Blind devotion”?
Like your “blind devotion” of EVERYTHING that is Donnie?
“Honest criticism”. Is is “honest” to call someone a liar without knowing what he really knew about something?
Is it “honest criticism” to call someone a liar for past votes on issues, when you take those votes out of context with what was going on at the time?
Don’t call someone a liar, unless you have real evidence to support it.
BTW, do you REALLY think Donnie’s acting presidential?
Do you really believe Donnie’s a true CONSERVATIVE on the following issues:
Pro-life
Strict Constitutionalist, Pro-life judges?
Repeal of Obamacare?
Back room deals with Pelosi and Reid?
How about doing backroom deals with Reid and Pelosi?
How about appointing pro-life, strict constitutionalists to the Supreme Court?
Upholding all rights under the Constitution, other than just the 2nd Amendment?
Do you know where he REALLY stands on THOSE issues?
Do you care about these issues?
Do you have any rational, independent thought of EVERYTHING he stands for, or are you just drinking all the Kool Aid?
Notice how you make all these spam like posts, but won't actually "debate the issues" like you claimed you wanted.
So, since you don't want to debate Cruz's dishonest conduct during the race, why don't you want to debate Cruz's support for legalization, which he did even after the gang of eight fight was over, despite his claim in December that he never supported it?
So, let's talk record, statements, the hows and the whens, shall we? Or will you just make all these nonsensical, shotgun like accusations which I have no energy to go through one by one? Let's talk about this then, and see if you really know who your candidate is. (You don't, just FYI.)
You first.
I want to know if you actually have a brain, or if you need to be oiled.
You give me the answer to my questions about Donnie, and I’ll answer yours.
In other words, you want me to respond to 20 billion charges so you can avoid responding to one, when you appear to be entirely irrational and unhinged. No thanks! Better things to do with my time.
Great.
Keep drinking from the yellow, piss water, Kool Aid trough like a good lil’ Trumpbot horse and keep calling people liars. That’s what Donnie wants you to do.
I noticed I have never have any takers who are Donnie-backers that EVER want to talk about the important CONSERVATIVE issues. It’s just nothing but the same nonsensical accusations about Cruz.
I find it ironic that probably the same freepers who crucified Romney four years ago because they didn’t believe his conversion from being a pro-choicer to a pro-lifer are somehow just fine and dandy now with Donnie’s so-called conversion and won’t express even a thought or concern about it.
The reason I have so many questions, is there’s a lot to question about Trump’s so-called CONSERVATISM. On the other hand, I know EXACTLY where Cruz stands on the CONSERVATIVE issues.
It doesn’t appear you really want to discuss conservative issues with any Trump supporter after that rant.
As far as Trump, he is pro-life, has been for years.
Probably because you are an idiot who spams 20 gazillian things like "He's not pro-life!" and expect people to take you seriously.
Oh Contrare.
I’d love to believe my concerns are unwarranted, because I fear what could happen if they’re not. Nobody supporting Trump ever addresses thiese concerns so they worry me.
BTW, so was Romney, but some freepers wouldn’t vote for him against Zero because they didn’t believe him. I don’t believe the same conservative standard is being applied to Trump by freepers and I’m skeptical about his pro- life change. I’m also very concerned he may appoint strict constitutionalists to the Supreme Court. That could affect things for the perpetuity of our country
But thanks for responding to one issue.
I meant he might NOT appoint strict constitutionalists
I’m almost the same age as Trump. In my youth, I was pro-choice because I never really thought about it extensively. I would have never considered an abortion and didn’t know anyone who would have. That was back when Reagan was my governor and signed an abortion law.
That was of course many years ago and not a lot of people got abortions, at least not in my circles. Most of us had morals and a Christian upbringing.
I am now very pro-life. Abortions now are just a form of birth control and many see no wrong there. That is horrendous.
I believe Trump originally thought the same as I. It was rare and not in his circle. Several years ago when he gave it consideration, he came to the same pro-life decision I did. Abortion is wrong, period.
We evolve over time, with knowledge and life experiences. Perhaps you do not but the majority of people do.
Other than Google I can’t find any thing on Trumps Draft Dodging.
Thank you for your well thought out, rational post. I also very much applaud you for conversion to this position.
I do not doubt there are many others like you, even some politicians. Obviously, Reagan himself made a similar change.
However, when it comes to national politics, there are a lot of politicians who will say they are pro life for political expediency. There are several that have said one thing, and then they slide back.
Back in 1999, Trump was famously interviewed and stated publicly he was pro-choice to the point that he even supported partial birth abortions. Now, he says he’s changed completely the other way, but he doesn’t talk about it much, and he has no official position on his website.
My point is that I really, truly hope he has completely changed over, but I don’t fully trust him. I have no doubt on Cruz’s position this, as well as many other Conservative positions.
But if Trump becomes President, I hope he really follows through when it comes to pro-life judges, because I believe that they are the most often are likely to become strict constructionists of the Constitution.
It is crucial that we get these kind of judges on the Supreme Court, because if we continue to slide into the liberal, activist, anti-constitutional, godless direction we are going, I fear that what we stand for as a country and our most cherished rights will be eroded and taken away. And three new bad judges could just about destroy us completely.
Our government is getting more secularized every day, and our judiciary nationwide has decided to take things in a direction that we never could have dreamed of 10, 15, 20 years ago.
Since the next President may get the choice of three or four replacements for SCOTUS, we must elect a President who will recognize this as an important issue and make the appointments intelligently and seriously.
Believe me, I pray that God gives us wisdom to elect the right President based upon this issue and many other important issues, so that our country can be reformed and restored to true greatness.
Trump is an old man, and spent virtually his entire adult life actively supporting abortion on demand, in words and deeds.
He only "changed" to run for president as a Republican. And even now he is utterly clueless about abortion. Anyone who really knows anything about the subject, and listens to him, can easily discern this.
So when does MSM release all the bad sh-t about Hillary. /rhetorical question
If the stories about Angel are true, Rubio may be in trouble for poor judgement on picking friends.
*************************************
I recall reading here on FR a couple of weeks ago that Rubio and two guys were nabbed by cops for being in a Miami park after closing hours and drinking beer. The park was known for being a hangout for gay activity and pick-ups.
Hush Bimbo will stay neutral,...
***********************************
Hardly! Rush has been pushing for Rubio like crazy and even saying he is a Conservative. ...Rush is off the rails.
I think he means lily white Hispanic.
*********************************************
There are many such people in Mexico, Cuba and South America, as they did not mix with the Indians and retained their Spanish ancestry. The Mestizos that are descendants of the mix are what are normally considered Mexicans/”Latinos”. Cruz and Rubio are both Anglos.
“Conservatives who vote for Trump even as he leers* at their wives are giving a whole new meaning to the neologism cuckservative.
* Given the Donald’s self-confessed yen for married women.”
You know, it’s hard to make believable your “leering at wives” narrative on behavior indulged in by a much more youthful Trump in his heyday as a handsome, virile man, seeing as he is now 69 years old, and a grandfather multiple times over, with extremely well brought up adult children. Plus as a well known workaholic, he really didn’t have much time to be a playboy. Anyhow, he has always been the marrying kind. Sort of loses any lecher impact at this point in time, lol, but you keep trying to make it stick.
Trump has been happily married to Melania now for years, and his “player” days are long gone, now just memories of his lost youth. Trump has bigger fish to fry, namely trying to save our country from the brink of insolvency and international disaster. You should wish you had one-tenth the success and talent as Donald J. Trump. Jealous?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.