He made it perfectly clear in the discussion with the contributor, that he was not endorsing an abomination. Again, this is a cheap shot.
LOL WOW. Talk about spinning. . .
ROFLOL @ ‘’does not spin his wheels PONTIFICATING. . .’’? snort
Holy Cow, that’s a keyboard drowner.
According to your associates, it IS a moral issue. I have been flamed on this very board for not speaking strongly enough against gays or ‘marriage’ (I forget which. I think it had to do with the Kim Miller thing) as a . . . oh, I dunno WHAT the accusation was. OR CARE.
How do you know if he ‘’made clear he wasn’t endorsing an abomination’’? Were you there?
My issue with this is the MORAL RELATIVISM and THE HYPOCRISY of it.
Y’all will damn somebody to hell & back, then TURN RIGHT AROUND & roundly condemn someone- who is NOT of your sect, for doing virtually the same thing.
Cheap shots- well, y’all are looking like the EXPERTS in throwing cheap shots.
I’ll give y’all one thing. Every encounter with one of you is INCREDIBLE.