Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baynative
I can’t let go of his amnesty disappointment, but I am stunned when people say they would prefer Hillary. Would you really do that?

What difference does it make?

24 posted on 02/02/2016 9:33:18 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator; Sans-Culotte; Sioux-san; pogo101; Lurkinanloomin; A CA Guy; sarge83
I think we all agree that it will be hard to accept that Rubio has committed himself to standing against amnesty.

So for the sake of argument since several people say he's not different than Hillary; that would mean that he will support raising taxes by $1.3 TRILLION; that he will support women in combat; that he will support expanding the EPA, the Dept of Ed, the Dept of Commerce and the oppressive fist created in the Dept. of Interior by Sally Jewell.

That would mean that he would never reopen hearings on the IRS persecution of Tea Party organizations, Benghazi or Emailgate.

I think those assumptions are a stretch for Rubio, but reality for Hillary. If they are all to be considered even that still leaves the Supreme Court that will probably have four vacancies in the next four years. What I am hearing here is that all of you would prefer those choices going to Hillary.

I can't believe you would feel that way. I'm not supporting Rubio at this time, but I damn sure will take my chances on us being able to influence him over Hillary.

85 posted on 02/02/2016 12:28:16 PM PST by Baynative (If socialist democrat ideas are so good for people why must they be mandatory?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson