Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
I suppose the owners should be happy they were ordered to pay only £500 compensation to the gay couple who got their feelings hurt. < / sarcasm >

Weren't the bakers in Oregon ordered to pay $150,000?

8 posted on 02/02/2016 8:21:07 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Weren't the bakers in Oregon ordered to pay $150,000?

$135,000. Outrageous. I miss the days of being able to hang a sign that says, "We reserve the right to refuse business for any reason" and have that stick. Being coerced by the government to provide a service that you have no desire to provide (nor reap the financial reward from providing) is simply wrong. Being fined for refusing the service is over the top. The "customers" should have sought another merchant willing to provide the service instead of seeking an opportunity to enrich themselves using phony tort law and invented offense and hurt feelings.

It is this kind of legal BS that keeps me working as a W2 employee instead of running my own business. Government regulations are simply too intrusive to make that even slightly appealing.

22 posted on 02/02/2016 8:42:50 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson