The context of my post (and this article) is Palin's statement that her decision to support Trump was easy in light of Cruz's inconsistencies. Even if Cruz has not himself been 100% consistent, the fact is that Trump has not been consistent either. So, if inconsistencies were enough to stop her from supporting Cruz, why would she support Trump instead?
Consistency would suggest that Trump has switched his position multiple times this election cycle. This can only be accurately applied to Ted Cruz, who supported legalization in March, then denied it and began evading questions for 9 months on the topic, and then in December claimed that he never supported legalization at all.
Cruz people are living in the false bubble of conservatism in the Bush years.
Palin realizes that double-talking the issues with no real conservative wins is a GOPe strategy for failure.
Sarah Palin’s is the avant-garde of conservatism. Just not Bush-era “conservatism”.