Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

According to the article, in order to get this respectable lead for Trump, Quinnipiac assumes a historical drop in both evangelical and very conservative voter turnout. These are 2 blocks which unsurprisingly are for Cruz.

What do they base this on? Why, for the first time in decades, would a huge number of evangelicals and very conservative voters decide to sit out the caucus?


23 posted on 02/01/2016 6:38:30 AM PST by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mangia E Statti Zitto

According to the article, in order to get this respectable lead for Trump, Quinnipiac assumes a historical drop in both evangelical and very conservative voter turnout. These are 2 blocks which unsurprisingly are for Cruz.

What do they base this on? Why, for the first time in decades, would a huge number of evangelicals and very conservative voters decide to sit out the caucus?

____________________

They are not assuming a drop in evangelical and very conservative voter participation. They are assuming a surge in voters outside those group. That surge would dilute the effect of the evangelicals and very conservative.

The assumption is merely that. We shall see.


43 posted on 02/01/2016 7:03:50 AM PST by Psalm 144 (This primary is raw Americana! Tom Sawyer versus Sid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Mangia E Statti Zitto

You nailed it.


179 posted on 02/01/2016 7:58:33 PM PST by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson